Literature DB >> 11344296

Declines of biomes and biotas and the future of evolution.

D S Woodruff1.   

Abstract

Although panel discussants disagreed whether the biodiversity crisis constitutes a mass extinction event, all agreed that current extinction rates are 50-500 times background and are increasing and that the consequences for the future evolution of life are serious. In response to the on-going rapid decline of biomes and homogenization of biotas, the panelists predicted changes in species geographic ranges, genetic risks of extinction, genetic assimilation, natural selection, mutation rates, the shortening of food chains, the increase in nutrient-enriched niches permitting the ascendancy of microbes, and the differential survival of ecological generalists. Rates of evolutionary processes will change in different groups, and speciation in the larger vertebrates is essentially over. Action taken over the next few decades will determine how impoverished the biosphere will be in 1,000 years when many species will suffer reduced evolvability and require interventionist genetic and ecological management. Whether the biota will continue to provide the dependable ecological services humans take for granted is less clear. The discussants offered recommendations, including two of paramount importance (concerning human populations and education), seven identifying specific scientific activities to better equip us for stewardship of the processes of evolution, and one suggesting that such stewardship is now our responsibility. The ultimate test of evolutionary biology as a science is not whether it solves the riddles of the past but rather whether it enables us to manage the future of the biosphere. Our inability to make clearer predictions about the future of evolution has serious consequences for both biodiversity and humanity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344296      PMCID: PMC33236          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.101093798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Biodiversity. Extinction by numbers.

Authors:  S L Pimm; P Raven
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Delayed biological recovery from extinctions throughout the fossil record.

Authors:  J W Kirchner; A Weil
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history.

Authors:  A Purvis; P M Agapow; J L Gittleman; G M Mace
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.

Authors:  O E Sala; F S Chapin; J J Armesto; E Berlow; J Bloomfield; R Dirzo; E Huber-Sanwald; L F Huenneke; R B Jackson; A Kinzig; R Leemans; D M Lodge; H A Mooney; M Oesterheld; N L Poff; M T Sykes; B H Walker; M Walker; D H Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Interspecific Competition, Environmental Gradients, Gene Flow, and the Coevolution of Species' Borders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Bt corn pollen impacts on nontarget lepidoptera: assessment of effects in nature.

Authors:  D S Pimentel; P H Raven
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages.

Authors:  G Hewitt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  11 in total

1.  How many named species are valid?

Authors:  John Alroy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Historical climate change and speciation: neotropical seasonally dry forest plants show patterns of both tertiary and quaternary diversification.

Authors:  R Toby Pennington; Matt Lavin; Darién E Prado; Colin A Pendry; Susan K Pell; Charles A Butterworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Environmental stochasticity in dispersal areas can explain the "mysterious" disappearance of breeding populations.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Fermín Otalora; Fabrizio Sergio; Miguel Ferrer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Toxic effect and adaptation in Scenedesmus intermedius to anthropogenic chloramphenicol contamination: genetic versus physiological mechanisms to rapid acquisition of xenobiotic resistance.

Authors:  S Sánchez-Fortún; F Marvá; M Rouco; E Costas; V López-Rodas
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Introgression of domesticated alleles into a wild trout genotype and the impact on seasonal survival in natural lakes.

Authors:  Wendy Vandersteen; Pete Biro; Les Harris; Robert Devlin
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Distribution Types of Lichens in Hungary That Indicate Changing Environmental Conditions.

Authors:  Edit Farkas; Nóra Varga; Katalin Veres; Gábor Matus; Mónika Sinigla; László Lőkös
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03

7.  Colloquium paper: where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions.

Authors:  Paul R Ehrlich; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The evolution and phylogeography of the African elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Lori S Eggert; Caylor A Rasner; David S Woodruff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Adaptation prevents the extinction of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under toxic beryllium.

Authors:  Beatriz Baselga-Cervera; Eduardo Costas; Estéfano Bustillo-Avendaño; Camino García-Balboa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Females lead population collapse of the endangered Hawaii creeper.

Authors:  Leonard A Freed; Rebecca L Cann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.