Literature DB >> 22344824

Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Miika Koskinen1, Jaakko Viinikanoja, Mikko Kurimo, Arto Klami, Samuel Kaski, Riitta Hari.   

Abstract

It is a challenge for current signal analysis approaches to identify the electrophysiological brain signatures of continuous natural speech that the subject is listening to. To relate magnetoencephalographic (MEG) brain responses to the physical properties of such speech stimuli, we applied canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and a Bayesian mixture of CCA analyzers to extract MEG features related to the speech envelope. Seven healthy adults listened to news for an hour while their brain signals were recorded with whole-scalp MEG. We found shared signal time series (canonical variates) between the MEG signals and speech envelopes at 0.5-12 Hz. By splitting the test signals into equal-length fragments from 2 to 65 s (corresponding to 703 down to 21 pieces per the total speech stimulus) we obtained better than chance-level identification for speech fragments longer than 2-3 s, not used in the model training. The applied analysis approach thus allowed identification of segments of natural speech by means of partial reconstruction of the continuous speech envelope (i.e., the intensity variations of the speech sounds) from MEG responses, provided means to empirically assess the time scales obtainable in speech decoding with the canonical variates, and it demonstrated accurate identification of the heard speech fragments from the MEG data.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344824      PMCID: PMC6869971          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  35 in total

1.  The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Xavier De Tiège; Marc Op de Beeck; Noémie Ligot; Philippe Paquier; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Riitta Hari; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Unsupervised analysis of fMRI data using kernel canonical correlation.

Authors:  David R Hardoon; Janaina Mourão-Miranda; Michael Brammer; John Shawe-Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visual image reconstruction from human brain activity using a combination of multiscale local image decoders.

Authors:  Yoichi Miyawaki; Hajime Uchida; Okito Yamashita; Masa-aki Sato; Yusuke Morito; Hiroki C Tanabe; Norihiro Sadato; Yukiyasu Kamitani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; W Kyle Simmons; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Dependencies between stimuli and spatially independent fMRI sources: towards brain correlates of natural stimuli.

Authors:  Jarkko Ylipaavalniemi; Eerika Savia; Sanna Malinen; Riitta Hari; Ricardo Vigário; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Brain-wave recognition of sentences.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Brain wave recognition of words.

Authors:  P Suppes; Z L Lu; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Bayesian reconstruction of natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Kendrick N Kay; Michael Oliver; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Human cortical responses to the speech envelope.

Authors:  Steven J Aiken; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Envelope responses in single-trial EEG indicate attended speaker in a 'cocktail party'.

Authors:  Cort Horton; Ramesh Srinivasan; Michael D'Zmura
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Dynamic Time-Locking Mechanism in the Cortical Representation of Spoken Words.

Authors:  A Nora; A Faisal; J Seol; H Renvall; E Formisano; R Salmelin
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Exploring Frequency-Dependent Brain Networks from Ongoing EEG Using Spatial ICA During Music Listening.

Authors:  Yongjie Zhu; Chi Zhang; Hanna Poikonen; Petri Toiviainen; Minna Huotilainen; Klaus Mathiak; Tapani Ristaniemi; Fengyu Cong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  The integration of social and neural synchrony: a case for ecologically valid research using MEG neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Kaisu Lankinen; Maria Hakonen; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.