Literature DB >> 9140022

Sucrose vs. maltose taste discrimination by rats depends on the input of the seventh cranial nerve.

A C Spector1, S Markison, S J St John, M Garcea.   

Abstract

Although rats treat the taste of sucrose and maltose as perceptually similar, they nonetheless appear to be able to distinguish between the two sugars, as suggested from prior work examining the cross-generalization of conditioned taste aversions. This study explictly tested whether rats could behaviorally discriminate sucrose from maltose and examined the relative importance of the gustatory input of the seventh and ninth cranial nerves in maintaining such performance. Water-restricted rats were presurgically trained in a conditioned avoidance task to suppress licking to sucrose or maltose and to maintain licking to the other sugar. Concentration (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 M) was varied to make intensity an irrelevant cue. Stimuli were randomly presented in 5-s trials during 50-min sessions. Bilateral transection of the chorda tympani nerve (CT) or the glossopharyngeal nerve or sham surgery did not disrupt discrimination performance. In contrast, combined transection of the CT and greater superficial petrosal nerve, which collectively removes the taste input of the seventh cranial nerve, caused severe impairments in sugar discriminability. In these rats, performance was more disturbed at the lower concentrations. These findings confirm that rats can discriminate sucrose from maltose and that this capability relies heavily on the taste input of the seventh cranial nerve. Although the input of the ninth cranial nerve is unnecessary, it may help sustain partial competence in this task, especially at high concentrations, in the combined absence of the CT and greater superficial petrosal nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9140022     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1997.272.4.R1210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  24 in total

Review 1.  It's all a matter of taste: gustatory processing and ingestive decisions.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Necessity of the glossopharyngeal nerve in the maintenance of normal intake and ingestive bout size of corn oil by rats.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Ginger D Blonde; Enshe Jiang; Dani Gonzalez; James C Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  In vivo recordings from rat geniculate ganglia: taste response properties of individual greater superficial petrosal and chorda tympani neurones.

Authors:  Suzanne I Sollars; David L Hill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Licking and gaping elicited by microstimulation of the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Nicole R Kinzeler; Susan P Travers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

7.  Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Mice perceive synergistic umami mixtures as tasting sweet.

Authors:  Louis N Saites; Zachary Goldsmith; Jaron Densky; Vivian A Guedes; John D Boughter
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Stacy L Kopka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Contribution of the T1r3 taste receptor to the response properties of central gustatory neurons.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.