Literature DB >> 11861634

Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside.

Cornelia M Ruland1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increasing movement toward shared decision making and the incorporation of patients' preferences into health care decision making, little research has been done on the development and evaluation of support systems that help clinicians elicit and integrate patients' preferences into patient care. This study evaluates nurses' use of CHOICE, a handheld-computer-based support system for preference-based care planning, which assists nurses in eliciting patients' preferences for functional performance at the bedside. Specifically, it evaluates the effects of system use on nurses' care priorities, preference achievement, and patients' satisfaction.
DESIGN: Three-group sequential design with one intervention and two control groups (N=155). In the intervention group, nurses elicited patients' preferences for functional performance with the handheld-computer-based CHOICE application as part of their regular admission interview; preference information was added to patients' charts and used in subsequent care planning.
RESULTS: Nurses' use of CHOICE made nursing care more consistent with patient preferences (F=11.4; P<0.001) and improved patients' preference achievement (F=4.9; P<0.05). Furthermore, higher consistency between patients' preferences and nurses' care priorities was associated with higher preference achievement (r=0.49; P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of a handheld-computer-based support system for preference-based care planning improved patient-centered care and patient outcomes. The technique has potential to be included in clinical practice as part of nurses' routine care planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861634      PMCID: PMC344576          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m0891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  16 in total

Review 1.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Developing and testing a multimedia presentation of a health-state description.

Authors:  M K Goldstein; A E Clarke; D Michelson; A M Garber; M R Bergen; L A Lenert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Functional status and the forward progress of merry-go-rounds: toward a coherent analytical framework.

Authors:  N K Leidy
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Including patient preferences in nurses' assessment of older patients.

Authors:  C M Ruland; D Kresevic; M Lorensen
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 7.  Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review.

Authors:  J R Lewis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Development of a patient satisfaction scale.

Authors:  E L La Monica; M T Oberst; A R Madea; R M Wolf
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Methodological issues in measuring patient-reported outcomes: the agenda of the Work Group on Outcomes Assessment.

Authors:  F J Fowler; P D Cleary; J Magaziner; D L Patrick; K L Benjamin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; P Tugwell; G A Wells; T Elmslie; E Jolly; G Hollingworth; R McPherson; E Drake; W Hopman; T Mackenzie
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  22 in total

1.  The use of personal digital assistants in the health sciences: results of a survey.

Authors:  Sandra L De Groote; Marceline Doranski
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

Review 2.  The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.

Authors:  Anthony D Harris; Jessina C McGregor; Eli N Perencevich; Jon P Furuno; Jingkun Zhu; Dan E Peterson; Joseph Finkelstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Comparing tailored computerized symptom assessments to interviews and questionnaires.

Authors:  Cornelia Ruland; Jo Røslien; Suzanne Bakken; Jørn Kristiansen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study.

Authors:  V Anand; S McKee; T M Dugan; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Harald H Holte; Jo Røislien; Cathy Heaven; Glenys A Hamilton; Jørn Kristiansen; Heidi Sandbaek; Stein O Kvaløy; Line Hasund; Misoo C Ellison
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Management of gastrointestinal symptoms in advanced cancer patients: the rapid learning cancer clinic model.

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Jane L Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.302

8.  Implementing evidence-based practices for people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Gary R Bond; Susan M Essock
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Designing tailored Internet support to assist cancer patients in illness management.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Annette Jeneson; Trine Andersen; Roar Andersen; Laura Slaughter; Shirley M Moore
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

10.  Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.

Authors:  Noreen M Clark; Belinda W Nelson; Melissa A Valerio; Z Molly Gong; Judith C Taylor-Fishwick; Monica Fletcher
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2009-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.