Literature DB >> 8047422

Functional status and the forward progress of merry-go-rounds: toward a coherent analytical framework.

N K Leidy1.   

Abstract

Functional status is frequently discussed as a key element of nursing practice and a critical outcome criterion, and yet this phenomenon is poorly understood. Many important questions have not been addressed, in part because terms such as functional status, functional ability, health status, and quality of life have been used interchangeably. Failure to clearly outline the terminology and refine the definitions has placed us on a functional status merry-go-round that inhibits scientific progress in this area. The purpose of this article is to introduce an analytical framework for the study of functional status. Four dimensions of functional status are proposed: functional capacity, performance, reserve, and capacity utilization. These terms are defined and clarified through a discussion emphasizing the consequences for measurement, intervention, and clinical trials. The article concludes by illustrating the utility of the framework in recognizing and appreciating functional status trajectory patterns in aging and chronic illness.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8047422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  68 in total

1.  The development and testing of an instrument for perceived self-efficacy for fatigue self-management.

Authors:  Amy J Hoffman; Alexander von Eye; Audrey G Gift; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Marilyn Rothert
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  A data-driven approach for extracting "the most specific term" for ontology development.

Authors:  Guergana K Savova; Marcelline Harris; Thomas Johnson; Serguei V Pakhomov; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Nutritional status and functional capacity of community-dwelling elderly in Southern Laos.

Authors:  Joweria Nambooze; Miho Fujimura; Tsukasa Inaoka
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Relationship of depressive symptoms to the impact of physical symptoms on functional status in women with heart failure.

Authors:  Eun Kyeung Song; Debra K Moser; Terry A Lennie
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Palliative care symptom assessment for patients with cancer in the emergency department: validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-life care needs in the Emergency Department instrument.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction?

Authors:  Daniel S J Costa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Feasibility and Efficacy of a Self-Management Intervention for Insomnia in Stable Heart Failure.

Authors:  Nancy S Redeker; Sangchoon Jeon; Laura Andrews; John Cline; Daniel Jacoby; Vahid Mohsenin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Frailty in people with COPD, using the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey dataset (2003-2006).

Authors:  Soo Kyung Park; Caroline R Richardson; Robert G Holleman; Janet L Larson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Comparison of groups with different patterns of symptom cluster intensity across the breast cancer treatment trajectory.

Authors:  Hee-Ju Kim; Paul A McDermott; Andrea M Barsevick
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.