Literature DB >> 17238700

Comparing tailored computerized symptom assessments to interviews and questionnaires.

Cornelia Ruland1, Jo Røslien, Suzanne Bakken, Jørn Kristiansen.   

Abstract

We compared the performance of a computerized symptom assessment tool called Choice in terms of number of symptoms and time needed for 92 cancer patients with two other standard methods: interview and questionnaire. Choice outperformed interviews in number and precision of reported symptoms, and did better than questionnaires in focusing on bothersome symptoms. There were high correlations between Choice and questionnaires. Interface and symptom structure play an important role for adequately eliciting patients' symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238700      PMCID: PMC1839509     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  4 in total

1.  Helping healthcare consumers understand: an "interpretive layer" for finding and making sense of medical information.

Authors:  Dagobert Soergel; Tony Tse; Laura Slaughter
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

2.  Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.

Authors:  S A Grossman; V R Sheidler; K Swedeen; J Mucenski; S Piantadosi
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Thomas White; Marguerite Stevens; Gilbert Fanciullo; Samir M Khilani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sven Alfonsson; Pernilla Maathz; Timo Hursti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Reliability and validity issues related to interactive tailored patient assessments: a case study.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Suzanne Bakken; Jo Røislien
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.