Literature DB >> 9679994

Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy.

A M O'Connor1, P Tugwell, G A Wells, T Elmslie, E Jolly, G Hollingworth, R McPherson, E Drake, W Hopman, T Mackenzie.   

Abstract

Although practice guidelines suggest that postmenopausal women learn about the benefits and risks and consider their values when deciding about hormone therapy, the optimal decision-support method has not been established. In a randomized controlled trial, the authors compared the efficacy of a general educational pamphlet with that of a tailored decision aid. The pamphlet briefly summarized benefits, risks, and likely beneficiaries in general terms. The decision aid, delivered via booklet and audiotape, provided: detailed benefits and risks using functional terms and probabilities tailored to clinical risk; and steps for considering the issue in a woman's own situation, including a value-clarification exercise. Compared with the pamphlet group, the decision-aid group had statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of realistic personal expectations of the benefits and risks, decisional conflict, and perceived acceptability of the intervention. Levels of general knowledge about the main benefits and risks were comparable for the two interventions. It is concluded that tailored decision aids prepare women for decision making better than do general pamphlets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679994     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9801800307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  64 in total

1.  Development of a decision aid for atrial fibrillation who are considering antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  M Man-Son-Hing; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; R G Hart; G Feldman; J L Blackshear; D C Anderson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A key medical decision maker: the patient.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

Review 3.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

4.  A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data.

Authors:  Bryan C Wallace; Larry A Allen; Christopher E Knoepke; Russell E Glasgow; Carmen L Lewis; Diane L Fairclough; Laura J Helmkamp; Monica D Fitzgerald; Wendy S Tzou; Daniel B Kramer; Paul D Varosy; Sanjaya K Gupta; John M Mandrola; Scott C Brancato; Pamela N Peterson; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Lori A Bastian; Susan Halabi; Laura Fish; Isaac M Lipkus; Hayden B Bosworth; Barbara K Rimer; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Preliminary testing of a just-in-time, user-defined values clarification exercise to aid lower literate women in making informed breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Robert J Volk; Lois C Friedman; Thomas S Granchi; Nancy E Neff; Stephen J Spann; Emily K Robinson; Noriaki Aoki; J Robert Beck
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  The role of patients' meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems.

Authors:  Jack Dowie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Alan A Montgomery; Tom Fahey; Tim J Peters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.