V Anand1, S McKee2, T M Dugan2, S M Downs3. 1. Pediatric Institute , Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 2. Childrens Health Services Research, School of Medicine, Indiana University , IN. 3. Childrens Health Services Research, School of Medicine, Indiana University , IN ; Regenstrief Institute for Healthcare , IN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a scan-able paper based interface linked to a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) can effectively screen patients in pediatric waiting rooms and support the physician using evidence based care guidelines at the time of clinical encounter. However, the use of scan-able paper based interface has many inherent limitations including lacking real time communication with the CDSS and being prone to human and system errors. An electronic tablet based user interface can not only overcome these limitations, but may also support advanced functionality for clinical and research use. However, use of such devices for pediatric care is not well studied in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we enhance our pediatric CDSS with an electronic tablet based user interface and evaluate it for usability as well as for changes in patient questionnaire completion rates. METHODS: Child Health Improvement through Computers Leveraging Electronic Tablets or CHICLET is an electronic tablet based user interface. It is developed to augment the existing scan-able paper interface to our CDSS. For the purposes of this study, we deployed CHICLET in one outpatient pediatric clinic. Usability factors for CHICLET were evaluated via caregiver and staff surveys. RESULTS: When compared to the scan-able paper based interface, we observed an 18% increase or 30% relative increase in question completion rates using CHICLET. This difference was statistically significant. Caregivers and staff survey results were positive for using CHICLET in clinical environment. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic tablets are a viable interface for capturing patient self-report in pediatric waiting rooms. We further hypothesize that the use of electronic tablet based interfaces will drive advances in computerized clinical decision support and create opportunities for patient engagement.
BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a scan-able paper based interface linked to a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) can effectively screen patients in pediatric waiting rooms and support the physician using evidence based care guidelines at the time of clinical encounter. However, the use of scan-able paper based interface has many inherent limitations including lacking real time communication with the CDSS and being prone to human and system errors. An electronic tablet based user interface can not only overcome these limitations, but may also support advanced functionality for clinical and research use. However, use of such devices for pediatric care is not well studied in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we enhance our pediatric CDSS with an electronic tablet based user interface and evaluate it for usability as well as for changes in patient questionnaire completion rates. METHODS:Child Health Improvement through Computers Leveraging Electronic Tablets or CHICLET is an electronic tablet based user interface. It is developed to augment the existing scan-able paper interface to our CDSS. For the purposes of this study, we deployed CHICLET in one outpatient pediatric clinic. Usability factors for CHICLET were evaluated via caregiver and staff surveys. RESULTS: When compared to the scan-able paper based interface, we observed an 18% increase or 30% relative increase in question completion rates using CHICLET. This difference was statistically significant. Caregivers and staff survey results were positive for using CHICLET in clinical environment. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic tablets are a viable interface for capturing patient self-report in pediatric waiting rooms. We further hypothesize that the use of electronic tablet based interfaces will drive advances in computerized clinical decision support and create opportunities for patient engagement.
Authors: Rita Mangione-Smith; Alison H DeCristofaro; Claude M Setodji; Joan Keesey; David J Klein; John L Adams; Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Tamara M Dugan; Vibha Anand; Chandan Saha; Stephen M Downs Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Aaron E Carroll; Paul G Biondich; Vibha Anand; Tamara M Dugan; Meena E Sheley; Shawn Z Xu; Stephen M Downs Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: R A Jenders; G Hripcsak; R V Sideli; W DuMouchel; H Zhang; J J Cimino; S B Johnson; E H Sherman; P D Clayton Journal: Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care Date: 1995
Authors: Trudy van der Weijden; France Légaré; Antoine Boivin; Jako S Burgers; Haske van Veenendaal; Anne M Stiggelbout; Marjan Faber; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-02-02 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jessica Quinn; David J Klein; Stephanie Wagner; Cassandra Thomson; Melody Wu; Sarah Onorato; Mark A Schuster Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Randall W Grout; Erika R Cheng; Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Stephen M Downs Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Paul G Biondich; Tamara M Dugan; Stephen M Downs Journal: Artif Intell Med Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.326