Literature DB >> 20595307

Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial.

Cornelia M Ruland1, Harald H Holte, Jo Røislien, Cathy Heaven, Glenys A Hamilton, Jørn Kristiansen, Heidi Sandbaek, Stein O Kvaløy, Line Hasund, Misoo C Ellison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a computer-assisted, interactive tailored patient assessment (ITPA) tool in oncology practice on: documented patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support during treatment and rehabilitation. DESIGN AND METHODS: For this repeated measures clinical trial at a university hospital in Norway, 145 patients starting treatment for leukemia or lymphoma were randomly assigned to either an intervention (n=75) or control group (n=70). Both groups used the ITPA for symptom assessments prior to inpatient and outpatient visits for up to one year. The assessment summary, which displayed patients' self-reported symptoms, problems, and distress in rank-order of the patient's need for support, was provided to physicians and nurses in the intervention group only but not in the control group.
RESULTS: Significantly more symptoms were addressed in the intervention group patient charts versus those of the control group. Symptom distress in the intervention group decreased significantly over time in 11 (58%) of 19 symptom/problem categories versus 2 (10%) for the control group. Need for symptom management support over time also decreased significantly more for the intervention group than the control group in 13 (68%) symptom categories.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that an ITPA used in an interdisciplinary oncology practice can significantly improve patient-centered care and patient outcomes, including reduced symptom distress and reduced need for symptom management support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595307      PMCID: PMC2995659          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  32 in total

1.  Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  P E Schofield; P N Butow; J F Thompson; M H N Tattersall; L J Beeney; S M Dunn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting?

Authors:  Allison Boyes; Sallie Newell; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.

Authors:  N Mead; P Bower
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care.

Authors:  E Bruera; C Sweeney; K Calder; L Palmer; S Benisch-Tolley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Symptom and quality of life survey of medical oncology patients at a veterans affairs medical center: a role for symptom assessment.

Authors:  V T Chang; S S Hwang; M Feuerman; B S Kasimis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues.

Authors:  P N Butow; R F Brown; S Cogar; M H N Tattersall; S M Dunn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Dying patients' need for emotional support and personalized care from physicians: perspectives of patients with terminal illness, families, and health care providers.

Authors:  Marjorie D Wenrich; J Randall Curtis; Donna A Ambrozy; Jan D Carline; Sarah E Shannon; Paul G Ramsey
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Implementing touch-screen technology to enhance recognition of distress.

Authors:  K Clark; W A Bardwell; T Arsenault; R DeTeresa; M Loscalzo
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cornelia M Ruland; Thomas White; Marguerite Stevens; Gilbert Fanciullo; Samir M Khilani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  40 in total

1.  Creating computable algorithms for symptom management in an outpatient thoracic oncology setting.

Authors:  Mary E Cooley; David F Lobach; Ellis Johns; Barbara Halpenny; Toni-Ann Saunders; Guilherme Del Fiol; Michael S Rabin; Pamela Calarese; Isidore L Berenbaum; Ken Zaner; Kathleen Finn; Donna L Berry; Janet L Abrahm
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Development and evaluation of the Cancer Symptom Management System: Symptom Management Improves your LifE (SMILE)-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sun Young Rha; Jung Mo Nam; Jiyeon Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Effectiveness of Internet-based interventions in managing chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  S Moradian; N Voelker; C Brown; G Liu; D Howell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Factors associated with receipt of symptom screening in the year after cancer diagnosis in a universal health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A L Mahar; L E Davis; L D Bubis; Q Li; R Sutradhar; N G Coburn; L Barbera
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Attitudes of oncologists towards palliative care and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at an Ontario cancer center in Canada.

Authors:  Martin Chasen; Ravi Bhargava; Catherine Dalzell; José Luis Pereira
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical care of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jason Izard; Andrea Hartzler; Daniel I Avery; Cheryl Shih; Bruce L Dalkin; John L Gore
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Angela B Mariotto; Carla Parry; Catherine M Alfano; Lynne Padgett; Erin E Kent; Laura Forsythe; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Toward Meaningful Care Plan Clinical Decision Support: Feasibility and Effects of a Simulated Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gail M Keenan; Karen Dunn Lopez; Yingwei Yao; Vanessa E C Sousa; Janet Stifter; Alessandro Febretti; Andrew Johnson; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Do we reach the patients with the most problems? Baseline data from the WebCan study among survivors of head-and-neck cancer, Denmark.

Authors:  Trille Kjaer; Christoffer Johansen; Elo Andersen; Randi Karlsen; Anni Linnet Nielsen; Kirsten Frederiksen; Mikael Rørth; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.