Literature DB >> 11840112

A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine.

Bernard H Guiot1, Larry T Khoo, Richard G Fessler.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The technical feasibility of percutaneous microendoscopic bilateral decompression of lumbar stenosis via a unilateral approach was evaluated in a human cadaver model.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using a microendoscopic laminotomy technique to treat spinal stenosis. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive surgery is an important means of reducing tissue trauma and patient morbidity. This may prove to be essential in improving pain and in reducing postoperative stress responses and delayed sequelae that can lead to unfortunate complications after otherwise uneventful procedures. To date, minimally invasive lumbar endoscopic techniques have not been used to decompress the lumbar spinal canal.
METHODS: In each of four cadavers, the laminae of L1 through L4 were subjected to one of four procedures consisting of unilateral microendoscopic laminotomy, bilateral microendoscopic laminotomy, unilateral open laminotomy, and bilateral open laminotomy. Every procedure was performed once at all levels. Computed tomography was performed before and after laminotomy to establish the extent of decompression of the spinal canal, and measurements of the midsagittal, interpedicular, and decompression diameters were taken.
RESULTS: The four procedures were successfully performed at every level. Satisfactory decompression of the spinal canal was achieved regardless of the approach used. The exiting nerve roots were well visualized when any one of these techniques was used. Complications, including dural tears and facet complex instability, were independent of the procedure performed.
CONCLUSION: Microendoscopic laminotomy can be used to decompress the spinal canal as effectively as an open laminotomy and may prove to be beneficial in decreasing the complications and morbidity of standard treatments for lumbar stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840112     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu; Amir A Mehbod; Brian Hsu; Douglas W Pahl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities.

Authors:  C A Logroscino; L Proietti; E Pola; L Scaramuzzo; F C Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Contralateral facet-sparing sublaminar endoscopic foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar lateral recess stenosis: technical note.

Authors:  Guntram Krzok; Albert E Telfeian; Ralf Wagner; Christoph P Hofstetter; Menno Iprenburg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

7.  Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1-C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study.

Authors:  Gergely Bodon; Lajos Patonay; Gabor Baksa; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Maio; Masaki Kawai; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.