Literature DB >> 24584907

Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1-C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study.

Gergely Bodon1, Lajos Patonay, Gabor Baksa, Claes Olerud.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach used to reach the posterior aspect of the C1-C2 complex. Atlantoaxial fusion using a midline posterior approach and polyaxial screw and rod system is widely used. Although minimally invasive variations of this technique have been recently reported, the complex applied anatomy of these approaches has not been described. The C1-C2 complex represents an unique challenge because of its bony and vascular anatomy. In this study, the applied anatomy and feasibility of this technique are examined on cadavers.
METHODS: The microsurgical anatomy of the upper cervical spine is examined on a formalin-fixed and on a fresh cadaver. The muscle-splitting approach is performed on 12 fresh cadavers using this technique.
RESULTS: The minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach is described in detail. Relevant anatomy and bony landmarks that aid screw placement in C1 and C2 could be well visualized. Using this approach, we were able to reach the lateral mass of the atlas and the inferior articular process and pars interarticularis of the axis in all of the nine cadavers. We placed mini polyaxial screws in C1 lateral mass and C2 pars interarticularis in four cadavers according to the technique described by Harms and Melcher.
CONCLUSIONS: Using this approach, it was possible to reach the posterior aspect of C1 and C2; the relevant anatomy needed to perform a C1-C2 fusion could be well visualized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24584907     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-014-1274-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  18 in total

1.  The nuchal ligament restrains cervical spine flexion.

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Erik T K Peterson; Donita Bylski-Austrow; Alvin H Crawford; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Minimally invasive lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine: initial clinical experience with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; Allan D O Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Minimally invasive surgery for the management of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Paul Santiago; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Posterolateral protrusion of the vertebral artery over the posterior arch of the atlas: quantitative anatomical study using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamaguchi; Kuniki Eguchi; Yoshihiro Kiura; Masaaki Takeda; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-08

5.  Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image.

Authors:  H Iizuka; T Shimizu; K Tateno; N Toda; H Edakuni; H Shimada; K Takagishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation.

Authors:  A Goel; V Laheri
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  New techniques for exposure of posterior cervical spine through intermuscular planes and their surgical application.

Authors:  Tateru Shiraishi; Masahiro Kato; Yoshiyuki Yato; Seiji Ueda; Ryoma Aoyama; Jun-ichi Yamane; Kazuya Kitamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats.

Authors:  R Gejo; Y Kawaguchi; T Kondoh; E Tabuchi; H Matsui; K Torii; T Ono; T Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Tateru Shiraishi; Kentaro Fukuda; Yoshiyuki Yato; Mitsukazu Nakamura; Takeshi Ikegami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion: long-term evaluation of results and efficacy.

Authors:  T J Coyne; M G Fehlings; M C Wallace; M Bernstein; C H Tator
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

1.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Applied anatomy of screw placement via the posterior arch of the atlas and anatomy-based refinements of the technique.

Authors:  Gergely Bodon; Andras Grimm; Bernhard Hirt; Harald Seifarth; Pavel Barsa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-22

3.  Percutaneous, Navigated Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Domagoj Coric; Vincent J Rossi; John Peloza; Paul K Kim; Tim E Adamson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.