Literature DB >> 19352729

Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.

Serkan Erkan1, Chunhui Wu, Amir A Mehbod, Brian Hsu, Douglas W Pahl, Ensor E Transfeldt.   

Abstract

Single level axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) using a transsacral rod through a paracoccygeal approach has been developed with promising early clinical results and biomechanical stability. Recently, the transsacral rod has been extended to perform a two-level fusion at both L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels (AxiaLIF II). No biomechanical studies have been conducted on multilevel fusion using the AxiaLIF technique. In this study, the biomechanics of L4-S1 motion segments instrumented with the AxiaLIF II transsacral rod was evaluated. Six human cadaveric lumbosacral spine segments from L4 to S1 were used (age ranges 46-74 years). Unconstrained and non-destructive pure moments in axial torsion, lateral bending, and flexion extension were applied to each specimen following intact, standalone AxiaLIF II, and AxiaLIF II with two posterior fixation options: facet screws and pedicle screws with rods. Range of motion was calculated from the raw data collected with an optical motion tracking system. The two-level transsacral rod was successfully inserted in all the specimens. At L4-L5 level in axial torsion (AT) and flexion extension (FE), none of the surgical treatments showed statistically significant difference between the procedures (all P > 0.05) although facet screws and pedicle screws had higher stability on average. In lateral bending (LB), the two posterior fixation techniques had significantly higher construct stability (P < 0.05) than the standalone rod. No significant difference was found between facet screws and pedicle screws (P = 0.821). At L5-S1 level in AT and LB, none of the surgical treatments were found to be statistically significant (all P > 0.05). In FE, standalone two-level transsacral rod had significantly higher range of motion (ROM) compared with the posterior fixation techniques (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the standalone rod reduced intact ROM significantly. Supplementary fixations including facet screws and pedicle screws are required to achieve higher construct stability for successful fusion. Further clinical studies are essential to evaluate the practical success of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19352729      PMCID: PMC2899656          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0953-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Percutaneous interventions in the presacral space: CT-guided precoccygeal approach--early experience.

Authors:  J J Trambert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty: the IDET procedure.

Authors:  R F Heary
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-08

3.  New percutaneous access method for minimally invasive anterior lumbosacral surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Cragg; Allen Carl; Flavio Casteneda; Curtis Dickman; Lee Guterman; Carlos Oliveira
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-02

4.  "Does size matter?"A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Najma Farooq; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.

Authors:  Burak Akesen; Chunhui Wu; Amir A Mehbod; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-02

6.  Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine: technique, indications, results.

Authors:  D Grob; T Humke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Bernard H Guiot; Larry T Khoo; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anular incision technique on the strength and multidirectional flexibility of the healing intervertebral disc.

Authors:  B D Ahlgren; A Vasavada; R S Brower; C Lydon; H N Herkowitz; M M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Review: complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Authors:  Mick J Perez-Cruet; Richard G Fessler; Noel I Perin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  One-stage posterior decompression-stabilization and trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for severe L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Pietro Bartolozzi; Andrea Sandri; Marco Cassini; Matteo Ricci
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) approach for adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Woojin Cho; Akilah B King
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Stiffening effect of a transsacral fusion system for the lumbosacral junction. A probabilistic finite element analysis and sensitivity study].

Authors:  H N Boustani; A Rohlmann; O Abouezzeddine; G Bergmann; T Zander
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Axial lumbosacral interbody fusion appears safe as a method to obtain lumbosacral arthrodesis distal to long fusion constructs.

Authors:  Paul S Issack; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-13

5.  The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Thomas M Shea; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Minimally invasive trans-sacral approach to L5-S1 interbody fusion: Preliminary results from 1 center and review of the literature.

Authors:  W Daniel Bradley; Michael S Hisey; Sunita Verma-Kurvari; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

7.  Changes in neuroforaminal height with 2 level axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion at L4-S1.

Authors:  Satyajit Marawar; Nathaniel Ordway; Jin Jung; Mike Sun
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Mini posterior lumbar interbody fusion with presacral screw stabilization in early lumbosacral instability.

Authors:  Arjun Shetty; Abhishek R Kini; A Chacko; Upadhyaya Sunil; K Vinod; Lobo Geover
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Minimally invasive approaches for the correction of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Anatomic Study of Anterior Transdiscal Axial Screw Fixation for Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries.

Authors:  Wei Ji; Minghui Zheng; Dongbin Qu; Lin Zou; Yongquan Chen; Jianting Chen; Qingan Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.