Literature DB >> 21445617

A minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine instabilities.

C A Logroscino1, L Proietti, E Pola, L Scaramuzzo, F C Tamburrelli.   

Abstract

Percutaneous techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity of conventional open surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for instabilities and degenerative disc diseases. From May 2005 until October 2008, 20 patients affected by monosegmental instability and disc herniation underwent mini-open lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36. The mean follow-up was 24 months. The mean estimated blood loss was 126 ml; the mean length of stay was 5.3 days; the mean operative time was 171 min. At 24-month follow-up, the mean VAS score was 2.1, mean ODI was 27.1%, and mean SF-36 was 85.2%. 80 screws were implanted in 20 patients. 74 screws showed very good position, 5 screws acceptable, and 1 screw unacceptable. A solid fusion was achieved in 17 patients (85%). In our opinion, mini-open TLIF is a valid and safe treatment of lumbar instability and degenerative disc diseases in order to obtain faster return to daily activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21445617      PMCID: PMC3087039          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1762-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Langston T Holly; James D Schwender
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Larry T Khoo; Sylvain Palmer; Daniel T Laich; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Vinod K Podichetty; Paul Santiago; Faheem A Sandhu; John Spears; Kevin Kelly; Laurie Rice; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

4.  The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Soo Suk; Sung-Chul Bae
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Minimally invasive spine stabilisation with long implants.

Authors:  Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino; Luca Proietti; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Bernard H Guiot; Larry T Khoo; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery.

Authors:  Y Kawaguchi; S Yabuki; J Styf; K Olmarker; B Rydevik; H Matsui; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

Authors:  K Thomsen; F B Christensen; S P Eiskjaer; E S Hansen; S Fruensgaard; C E Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans.

Authors:  J R Styf; J Willén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Sanjay K Gupta
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Toshitada Miwa; Hironobu Sakaura; Tomoya Yamashita; Shozo Suzuki; Tetsuo Ohwada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Adult spinal deformity: effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages to restore disc angle and spino-pelvic parameters through completely mini-invasive trans-psoas and hybrid approach.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barone; Laura Scaramuzzo; Antonino Zagra; Fabrizio Giudici; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Minimally invasive surgery procedure in isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Maria Concetta Meluzio; Aaron Burrofato; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Eiji Mori; Seiji Okada; Takayoshi Ueta; Yugue Itaru; Takeshi Maeda; Osamu Kawano; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eleftherios Archavlis; Mario Carvi y Nievas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Javier Rodríguez-Vela; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Javier Muñoz-Marín; Antonio Herrera; José Velilla
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Clinical and Radiological Results of Microsurgical Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Decompression without Posterior Instrumentation for Lateral Recess Stenosis.

Authors:  Mehmet Demirayak; Lokman Şişman; Faik Türkmen; Duran Efe; Oğuzhan Pekince; Recep Gani Göncü; Cem Sever
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

10.  Posterior Decompression and Fusion: Whole-Spine Functional and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Anastasia Topalidou; George Tzagarakis; Konstantine Balalis; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.