Literature DB >> 22710631

Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Zachary A Smith1, Richard G Fessler.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) techniques were developed to address morbidities associated with open spinal surgery approaches. MISS was initially applied for indications such as the microendoscopic decompression of stenosis (MEDS)-an operation that has become widely implemented in modern spine surgery practice. Minimally invasive surgery for MEDS is an excellent example of how an MISS technique has improved outcomes compared with the use of traditional open surgical procedures. In parallel with reports of surgeon experience, accumulating clinical evidence suggests that MISS is favoured over open surgery, and one could argue that the role of MISS techniques will continue to expand. As the field of minimally invasive surgery has developed, MISS has been implemented for the treatment of increasingly difficult and complex pathologies, including trauma, spinal malignancies and spinal deformity in adults. In this Review, we present the accumulating evidence in support of minimally invasive techniques for established MISS indications, such as lumbar stenosis, and discuss the need for additional level I and level II data to demonstrate the benefit of MISS over traditional open surgery. The expanding utility of MISS techniques to address an increasingly broad range of spinal pathologies is also highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710631     DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol        ISSN: 1759-4758            Impact factor:   42.937


  76 in total

Review 1.  The lateral extracavitary approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Meic H Schmidt; Sanford J Larson; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  The effect of bilateral laminotomy versus laminectomy on the motion and stiffness of the human lumbar spine: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Amy M Cohen; Richard M Harrington; Randal P Ching
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Vertebral augmentation for compression fractures caused by malignant disease.

Authors:  Rahul Rastogi; Trusharth Patel; Robert A Swarm
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Minimally invasive posterolateral thoracic corpectomy: cadaveric feasibility study and report of four clinical cases.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Kim; John E O'Toole; Alfred T Ogden; Kurt M Eichholz; John Song; Sean D Christie; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Complications of scoliosis treatment.

Authors:  J H Moe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1967 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Tsung-Jen Huang; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu; Yen-Yao Li; Chin-Chang Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Minimally invasive extracavitary approach for thoracic discectomy and interbody fusion: 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes in 13 patients compared with a cohort of traditional anterior transthoracic approaches.

Authors:  Larry T Khoo; Zachary A Smith; Farbod Asgarzadie; Yorgios Barlas; Sean S Armin; Vartan Tashjian; Baron Zarate
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-07

8.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo; R B Keller; A M Chapin; D L Patrick; J M Long; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The use of thoracoscopy in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Robert P Norton; Deepan Patel; Mark F Kurd; George D Picetti; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999.

Authors:  K-A Jansson; P Blomqvist; F Granath; G Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  29 in total

1.  Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-12

2.  Let'X-STOP with any "distraction" from the true problem: scenarios in which minimally invasive surgery is not welcome!

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  The era of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases and the multidisciplinary management of complex cases.

Authors:  Rachit Kumar; Anick Nater; Ahmed Hashmi; Sten Myrehaug; Young Lee; Lijun Ma; Kristin Redmond; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Albert Yee; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-27

4.  Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; T De Silva; A Uneri; J Goerres; M Jacobson; M Ketcha; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J-P Wolinsky; J L Prince; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Evolution of Complex Spine Surgery in Neurosurgery: From Big to Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Mohamed Macki; Frank La Marca
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

6.  Efficacy of Single-Position Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peng Cheng; Xiao-Bo Zhang; Qi-Ming Zhao; Hai-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Perioperative Visual Loss in Spine Fusion Surgery: Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in the United States from 1998 to 2012 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Daniel S Rubin; Isaac Parakati; Lorri A Lee; Heather E Moss; Charlotte E Joslin; Steven Roth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Bart Morlion
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  CORR Insights®: Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?

Authors:  Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Primary dural repair in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Raqeeb M Haque; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Yousef Ahmed; Omar Uddin; Alfred T Ogden; Richard Fessler
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2013-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.