Literature DB >> 22253349

Use of a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for the optimisation of chest radiographic techniques for computed radiography imaging systems.

C S Moore1, G Avery, S Balcam, L Needler, A Swift, A W Beavis, J R Saunderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to derive an optimum radiographic technique for computed radiography (CR) chest imaging using a digitally reconstructed radiograph computer simulator. The simulator is capable of producing CR chest radiographs of adults with various tube potentials, receptor doses and scatter rejection.
METHODS: Four experienced image evaluators graded images of average and obese adult patients at different potentials (average-sized, n=50; obese, n=20), receptor doses (n=10) and scatter rejection techniques (average-sized, n=20; obese, n=20). The quality of the images was evaluated using visually graded analysis. The influence of rib contrast was also assessed.
RESULTS: For average-sized patients, image quality improved when tube potential was reduced compared with the reference (102 kVp). No scatter rejection was indicated. For obese patients, it has been shown that an antiscatter grid is indicated, and should be used in conjunction with as low a tube potential as possible (while allowing exposure times <20 ms). It is also possible to reduce receptor air kerma by 50% without adversely influencing image quality. Rib contrast did not interfere at any tube potential.
CONCLUSIONS: A virtual clinical trial has been performed with simulated chest CR images. Results indicate that low tube potentials (<102 kVp) are optimal for average and obese adults, the former acquired without scatter rejection, the latter with an anti-scatter grid. Lower receptor (and therefore patient doses) than those used clinically are possible while maintaining adequate image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22253349      PMCID: PMC3487078          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/47377285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  33 in total

1.  Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.

Authors:  M Sandborg; G McVey; D R Dance; G Alm Carlsson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.

Authors:  A Tingberg; C Herrmann; B Lanhede; A Almén; M Sandborg; G McVey; S Mattsson; W Panzer; J Besjakov; L G Månsson; S Kheddache; G Alm Carlsson; D R Dance; U Tylén; M Zankl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.

Authors:  J T Dobbins; J J Rice; C A Beam; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system.

Authors:  C E Floyd; J Y Lo; H G Chotas; C E Ravin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.

Authors:  B Lanhede; M Båth; S Kheddache; P Sund; L Björneld; M Widell; A Almén; J Besjakov; S Mattsson; A Tingberg; C Herrmann; W Panzer; M Zankl; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.

Authors:  H G Chotas; C E Floyd; J T Dobbins; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy.

Authors:  I G Zubal; C R Harrell; E O Smith; Z Rattner; G Gindi; P B Hoffer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; B F Wall; E S Fisher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.

Authors:  N Oda; H Nakata; S Murakami; K Terada; K Nakamura; A Yoshida
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Posterior beam-stop method for scatter fraction measurement in digital radiography.

Authors:  C E Floyd; J A Baker; J Y Lo; C E Ravin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Hannah M Linden; Alena Novakova; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

Authors:  Sadeq Al-Murshedi; Peter Hogg; Andrew England
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; T J Wood; G Avery; S Balcam; L Needler; A Smith; J R Saunderson; A W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Optimisation of tube voltage range (kVp) for AP abdomen, pelvis and spine imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system using a computer simulator.

Authors:  Craig Steven Moore; Tim Wood; Stephen Balcam; Liam Needler; Tim Guest; Wee Ping Ngu; Lee Wun Chong; John Saunderson; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimized tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.

Authors:  Craig Steven Moore; Tim Wood; Ged Avery; Steve Balcam; Liam Needler; Hiten Joshi; Najeeb Ahmed; John Saunderson; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.039

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.