Literature DB >> 8471996

Fitness and lifestyle parameters fail to predict back injuries in nurses.

A E Ready1, S L Boreskie, S A Law, R Russell.   

Abstract

Performance on fitness and back related isometric strength tests, as well as the response to a lifestyle questionnaire, were related to the subsequent occurrence of back injuries in 119 nurses. In all, 22% of subjects sustained injuries during the 18-month study. Injured nurses were more likely to be from high-risk wards and to have received worker's compensation pay for past back injuries. Fitness and lifestyle characteristics did not differ significantly between injured and not-injured groups. Using backward stepwise logistic regression, a model was developed that accounted for 41% of the variability between groups and predicted 67% of those injured. Prior compensation pay, smoking status, and job satisfaction were the most useful discriminators. It was concluded, however, that the fitness and lifestyle parameters measured did not effectively predict back injury in nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8471996     DOI: 10.1139/h93-008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1066-7814


  11 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Interventions to prevent back pain and back injury in nurses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna P Dawson; Skye N McLennan; Stefan D Schiller; Gwendolen A Jull; Paul W Hodges; Simon Stewart
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Physical loading and performance as predictors of back pain in healthy adults. A 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  U M Kujala; S Taimela; T Viljanen; H Jutila; J T Viitasalo; T Videman; M C Battié
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

5.  Back pain among echocardiographers.

Authors:  M Solanki; D Carr; M Martin
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Breath control during manual free-style lifting of a maximally tolerated load.

Authors:  Eric M Lamberg; Marshall Hagins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  EMG analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscles as a predictor of the risk of low-back pain.

Authors:  Abbas Heydari; Antoni V F Nargol; Anthony P C Jones; Anthony R Humphrey; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  California's nurse-to-patient ratio law and occupational injury.

Authors:  J Paul Leigh; Carrie A Markis; Ana-Maria Iosif; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Retrospective examination of injuries and physical fitness during Federal Bureau of Investigation new agent training.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Anita Spiess; David Swedler; Tyson Grier; Keith Hauret; James Yoder; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  Injury rates and injury risk factors among Federal Bureau of Investigation new agent trainees.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Tyson Grier; Anita Spiess; David I Swedler; Keith G Hauret; Bria Graham; James Yoder; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.