Literature DB >> 9160473

Psychosocial factors in the workplace--do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

A C Papageorgiou1, G J Macfarlane, E Thomas, P R Croft, M I Jayson, A J Silman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, population-based cohort study of working adults.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether work-related psychosocial factors and social status predict the occurrence of new episodes of low back pain and influence consultation behavior. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Dissatisfaction with work and social status has been associated with low back pain in several studies; few of these studies have been prospective or population based.
METHODS: An initial postal survey was returned by 4,501 (59%) adults (18-75 years old) registered with two primary care practices. From this, a cohort of 1,412 people currently in employment and free of low back pain was identified, and baseline information on work-related psychosocial factors and psychologic distress was obtained. Social class was derived from current occupation using a standardized classification. New episodes of low back pain occurring in the next 12 months were identified by continuous monitoring of primary care consulters and by mailing a second questionnaire a year later to identify occurrences of low back pain for which no consultation was sought.
RESULTS: The baseline cross-sectional survey showed modest but significant associations between low back pain and perceived inadequacy of income (risk ratio 1.3), dissatisfaction with work (risk ratio 1.4) and social class IV/V (risk ratio 1.2). In the follow-up year, the risk of reporting low back pain for which no consultation was sought doubled in those dissatisfied with their work. Both perceived inadequacy of income (odds ratio 3.6) and social class IV/V (odds ratio 4.8) were strongly associated with consulting with a new episode of low back pain during the follow-up year, an association more marked in women. The associations with work dissatisfaction and perceived adequacy of income were not explained by general psychologic distress or social status.
CONCLUSION: People dissatisfied with work are more likely to report low back pain for which they do not consult a physician, whereas lower social status and perceived inadequacy of income are independent risks for working people to seek consultation because of low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9160473     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain.

Authors:  A Ozguler; A Leclerc; M F Landre; F Pietri-Taleb; I Niedhammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Is life becoming more of a pain?

Authors:  P Croft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

Review 3.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

4.  Association of occupational physical demands and psychosocial working environment with disabling shoulder pain.

Authors:  D P Pope; A J Silman; N M Cherry; C Pritchard; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

6.  Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gareth T Jones; Ruth E Johnson; Nicola J Wiles; Carol Chaddock; Richard G Potter; Chris Roberts; Deborah P M Symmons; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Evidence for shared pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis, low back pain, and fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Roland Staud
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Epidemiology of low back pain in children and adolescents.

Authors:  G T Jones; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Work correlates of back problems and activity restriction due to musculoskeletal disorders in the Canadian national population health survey (NPHS) 1994-5 data.

Authors:  D C Cole; S A Ibrahim; H S Shannon; F Scott; J Eyles
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.