Literature DB >> 9758070

Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

S J Linton1, K Halldén.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because musculoskeletal pain is the second most frequent reason for seeking health care, the aims of this study were to determine the value of psychosocial variables in evaluating risk for developing chronic back pain problems and to develop a screening methodology to identify patients likely to have a poor prognosis. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with acute or subacute back pain, in which patients completed a screening questionnaire and were then followed up for 6 months to determine outcome. The primary outcome variable was accumulated sick leave.
METHODS: One hundred forty-two consecutive patients were asked to complete a questionnaire designed for this study. This questionnaire contained 24 items concerning psychosocial aspects of the problem. Six months later, patients were contacted to complete outcome questions about accumulated sick leave.
RESULTS: A total of 97% of the patients completed both questionnaires. Although patients, on average, improved greatly, 18% had 1-30 days and 20% had fewer than 30 days of sick leave during the follow-up period. Five variables were found to be the strongest predictors of sick leave outcome (fear-avoidance work beliefs, perceived improvement, problems with work function, stress, and previous sick leave), correctly classifying 73% of the patients as opposed to a chance rate of 33%. A total score was evaluated as a means of judging risk and found to be strongly related to outcome.
CONCLUSION: Potent psychosocial risk factors associated with future sick absenteeism were identified. Because the total score was related to outcome, the instrument may have use in screening patients with acute or subacute spinal pain in clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9758070     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  140 in total

1.  Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures.

Authors:  S Bakken; J J Cimino; R Haskell; R Kukafka; C Matsumoto; G K Chan; S M Huff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

3.  Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Hellum; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Øyvind Gjertsen; Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oliver Grundnes; Ivar Rossvoll; Jan Sture Skouen; Jens Ivar Brox; Kjersti Storheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Implementing the work disability prevention paradigm among therapists in Hong Kong: facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Andy S K Cheng; Edwin W C Lee; Eva Schonstein; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Problematic pain - redefining how we view pain?

Authors:  Chris Barker; Ann Taylor; Martin Johnson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-02

7.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

8.  Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

9.  The Key Role of Pain Catastrophizing in the Disability of Patients with Acute Back Pain.

Authors:  C Ramírez-Maestre; R Esteve; G Ruiz-Párraga; L Gómez-Pérez; A E López-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-04

10.  Insufficient diagnostic accuracy of a single-item questionnaire to detect psychosocial distress in temporomandibular disorder patients.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Mike T John; Levente Kriston; Oliver Schierz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.