Literature DB >> 8434325

Comparison of spinal health indicators in predicting spinal status in a 1-year longitudinal study.

M Rossignol1, M Lortie, E Ledoux.   

Abstract

A 1-year longitudinal study was performed to assess and compare the predictive qualities of spinal health indicators (excluding the cervical spine) among aircraft assembly workers having at least 1 year seniority in a large assembly plant. Ten health indicators were compared to determine their sensitivity and predictive power with regard to back compensation and absenteeism in 12 months follow-up, and the presence of any limitation at work due to the back, or symptoms to the back at the end of the interval. The initial response to a self-administered questionnaire was obtained from 269 male workers, of whom 205 (76.2%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. Initial prevalence of symptoms to the back was 42.3%, limitation in performing at work was 28.1%, consultation of a health professional was 7.3%, and a history of compensation for the back (ever) was reported by 30.4%. During the year of follow-up, 16 (6%) of the 269 workers initially enrolled were granted 17 compensated episodes. Of the 205 workers who responded to the follow-up, 33 (16.1%) have been absent from work (with or without compensation) because of their back. The presence, at the beginning of the study, of a limitation in performing at work or in activities of daily living and a history of compensation (ever) were the three indicators independently associated with the occurrence of compensation or absenteeism (total work disability) related to a back problem during the following year.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434325     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199301000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  S J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C W de Vet; G A M Ariëns; W van Mechelen; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Genetics of disc degeneration.

Authors:  Danny Chan; Youqiang Song; Pak Sham; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers.

Authors:  A Burdorf; B Naaktgeboren; W Post
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Back pain among echocardiographers.

Authors:  M Solanki; D Carr; M Martin
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Back pain and male parenthood.

Authors:  M Rossignol
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Are gender, marital status or parenthood risk factors for outcome of treatment for chronic disabling spinal disorders?

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer; Cindy L Kidner; Donald D McGeary
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

8.  Predicting the long term course of low back pain and its consequences for sickness absence and associated work disability.

Authors:  A Burdorf; J P Jansen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Risk factors for new episodes of sick leave due to neck or back pain in a working population. A prospective study with an 18-month and a three-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gunnar Bergström; Lennart Bodin; Helena Bertilsson; Irene B Jensen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.402

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.