Literature DB >> 11700898

Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: the effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude.

D E Williams1, E M Reingold.   

Abstract

Eye movements were monitored during the performance of triple conjunction search tasks. Stimuli varied in color, shape, and orientation. Across trials, the target was either present or absent, and displays consisted of 6, 12, or 24 stimuli. Stimulus discriminability was manipulated for the shape dimension, with half of the participants seeing displays of Es and Fs (low-discriminability [LD] condition) and half seeing displays of Cs and Ts (high-discriminability [HD] condition). Participants in both conditions performed two search tasks. In the single-feature (SF) task, the target stimulus shared one feature with each of the distractors, whereas in the two-feature (TF) task, it shared two features with each distractor. An examination of saccadic endpoints revealed that participants were more likely to fixate on distractor stimuli sharing color (SF task) or color and shape (TF task) with the target. This was a robust finding, being observed across participants, saccades of different amplitudes and sequential position, and following short and long latencies to move. The extent to which participants made use of shape information increased with discriminability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700898     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  42 in total

1.  Color coding and visual search.

Authors:  S L SMITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-11

2.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Critical color differences determined with a visual search task.

Authors:  A L Nagy; R R Sanchez
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Eye-movement parameters in pattern recognition.

Authors:  J D Gould; A Schaffer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-06

5.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  How serial is serial processing in vision?

Authors:  E Zohary; S Hochstein
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

9.  Late experience alters vision.

Authors:  T A Polk; M J Farah
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks.

Authors:  KangWoo Lee; Hyunseung Choo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Modelling attention in individual cells leads to a system with realistic saccade behaviours.

Authors:  Linda J Lanyon; Susan L Denham
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

8.  TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

9.  Time course of target recognition in visual search.

Authors:  Andreas Kotowicz; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes.

Authors:  Alex D Hwang; Emily C Higgins; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.