Literature DB >> 19757903

A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes.

Alex D Hwang1, Emily C Higgins, Marc Pomplun.   

Abstract

Recently, there has been great interest among vision researchers in developing computational models that predict the distribution of saccadic endpoints in naturalistic scenes. In many of these studies, subjects are instructed to view scenes without any particular task in mind so that stimulus-driven (bottom-up) processes guide visual attention. However, whenever there is a search task, goal-driven (top-down) processes tend to dominate guidance, as indicated by attention being systematically biased toward image features that resemble those of the search target. In the present study, we devise a top-down model of visual attention during search in complex scenes based on similarity between the target and regions of the search scene. Similarity is defined for several feature dimensions such as orientation or spatial frequency using a histogram-matching technique. The amount of attentional guidance across visual feature dimensions is predicted by a previously introduced informativeness measure. We use eye-movement data gathered from participants' search of a set of naturalistic scenes to evaluate the model. The model is found to predict the distribution of saccadic endpoints in search displays nearly as accurately as do other observers' eye-movement data in the same displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757903      PMCID: PMC3863603          DOI: 10.1167/9.5.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  25 in total

1.  Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  R Weidner; S Pollmann; H J Müller; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search.

Authors:  I T Hooge; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual feature integration theory: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Jeremy M Wolfe; Helga C Arsenio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Jim M P Monti; Emily H Trittschuh; Christina A Wieneke; Joy Hirsch; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque.

Authors:  A M Derrington; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  23 in total

1.  Search performance with discrete-cell stimulus arrays: filtered naturalistic images and probabilistic markers.

Authors:  Alan R Pinkus; Miriam J Poteet; Allan J Pantle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

7.  Modeling peripheral visual acuity enables discovery of gaze strategies at multiple time scales during natural scene search.

Authors:  Pavan Ramkumar; Hugo Fernandes; Konrad Kording; Mark Segraves
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 10.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.