Literature DB >> 11606536

The evolutionary analysis of "orphans" from the Drosophila genome identifies rapidly diverging and incorrectly annotated genes.

K J Schmid1, C F Aquadro.   

Abstract

In genome projects of eukaryotic model organisms, a large number of novel genes of unknown function and evolutionary history ("orphans") are being identified. Since many orphans have no known homologs in distant species, it is unclear whether they are restricted to certain taxa or evolve rapidly, either because of a lack of constraints or positive Darwinian selection. Here we use three criteria for the selection of putatively rapidly evolving genes from a single sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Thirteen candidate genes were chosen from the Adh region on the second chromosome and 1 from the tip of the X chromosome. We succeeded in obtaining sequence from 6 of these in the closely related species D. simulans and D. yakuba. Only 1 of the 6 genes showed a large number of amino acid replacements and in-frame insertions/deletions. A population survey of this gene suggests that its rapid evolution is due to the fixation of many neutral or nearly neutral mutations. Two other genes showed "normal" levels of divergence between species. Four genes had insertions/deletions that destroy the putative reading frame within exons, suggesting that these exons have been incorrectly annotated. The evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in closely related species is useful for the identification of both rapidly evolving and incorrectly annotated genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606536      PMCID: PMC1461820     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  49 in total

1.  A screen for fast evolving genes from Drosophila.

Authors:  K J Schmid; D Tautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.

Authors:  B Ewing; L Hillier; M C Wendl; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Functional genomics: it's all how you read it.

Authors:  P Hieter; M Boguski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  From genes to individuals: developmental genes and the generation of the phenotype.

Authors:  D Tautz; K J Schmid
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.

Authors:  J R Powell; E N Moriyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

Authors:  S F Altschul; T L Madden; A A Schäffer; J Zhang; Z Zhang; W Miller; D J Lipman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA.

Authors:  C Burge; S Karlin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  V L Bauer; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E N Moriyama; J R Powell
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers.

Authors:  Rajeev K Varshney; Wenbin Chen; Yupeng Li; Arvind K Bharti; Rachit K Saxena; Jessica A Schlueter; Mark T A Donoghue; Sarwar Azam; Guangyi Fan; Adam M Whaley; Andrew D Farmer; Jaime Sheridan; Aiko Iwata; Reetu Tuteja; R Varma Penmetsa; Wei Wu; Hari D Upadhyaya; Shiaw-Pyng Yang; Trushar Shah; K B Saxena; Todd Michael; W Richard McCombie; Bicheng Yang; Gengyun Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jun Wang; Charles Spillane; Douglas R Cook; Gregory D May; Xun Xu; Scott A Jackson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Accelerated evolutionary rate may be responsible for the emergence of lineage-specific genes in ascomycota.

Authors:  James J Cai; Patrick C Y Woo; Susanna K P Lau; David K Smith; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Genome-wide analysis of intronless genes in rice and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mukesh Jain; Paramjit Khurana; Akhilesh K Tyagi; Jitendra P Khurana
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Codon bias and noncoding GC content correlate negatively with recombination rate on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Hierarchical modularity and the evolution of genetic interactomes across species.

Authors:  Colm J Ryan; Assen Roguev; Kristin Patrick; Jiewei Xu; Harlizawati Jahari; Zongtian Tong; Pedro Beltrao; Michael Shales; Hong Qu; Sean R Collins; Joseph I Kliegman; Lingli Jiang; Dwight Kuo; Elena Tosti; Hyun-Soo Kim; Winfried Edelmann; Michael-Christopher Keogh; Derek Greene; Chao Tang; Pádraig Cunningham; Kevan M Shokat; Gerard Cagney; J Peter Svensson; Christine Guthrie; Peter J Espenshade; Trey Ideker; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Evidence suggesting that a fifth of annotated Caenorhabditis elegans genes may be pseudogenes.

Authors:  Andrew Mounsey; Petra Bauer; Ian A Hope
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cross-species comparison of Drosophila male accessory gland protein genes.

Authors:  J L Mueller; K Ravi Ram; L A McGraw; M C Bloch Qazi; E D Siggia; A G Clark; C F Aquadro; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Comparative analyses reveal distinct sets of lineage-specific genes within Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Haining Lin; Gaurav Moghe; Shu Ouyang; Amy Iezzoni; Shin-Han Shiu; Xun Gu; C Robin Buell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Revisiting the Saccharomyces cerevisiae predicted ORFeome.

Authors:  Qian-Ru Li; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; Haiyuan Yu; Jing-Dong J Han; Quan Zhong; Nicolas Simonis; Stanley Tam; Tong Hao; Niels J Klitgord; Denis Dupuy; Danny Mou; Ilan Wapinski; Aviv Regev; David E Hill; Michael E Cusick; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.