Literature DB >> 11997343

Evidence suggesting that a fifth of annotated Caenorhabditis elegans genes may be pseudogenes.

Andrew Mounsey1, Petra Bauer, Ian A Hope.   

Abstract

Only a minority of the genes, identified in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequence data by computer analysis, have been characterized experimentally. We attempted to determine the expression patterns for a random sample of the annotated genes using reporter gene fusions. A low success rate was obtained for evolutionarily recently duplicated genes. Analysis of the data suggests that this is not due to conditional or low-level expression. The remaining explanation is that most of the annotated genes in the recently duplicated category are pseudogenes, a proportion corresponding to 20% of all of the annotated C. elegans genes. Further support for this surprisingly high figure was sought by comparing sequences for families of recently duplicated C. elegans genes. Although only a preliminary analysis, clear evidence for a gene having been recently inactivated by genetic drift was found for many genes in the recently duplicated category. At least 4% of the annotated C. elegans genes can be recognized as pseudogenes simply from closer inspection of the sequence data. Lessons learned in identifying pseudogenes in C. elegans could be of value in the annotation of the genomes of other species where, although there may be fewer pseudogenes, they may be harder to detect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997343      PMCID: PMC186578          DOI: 10.1101/gr.208802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  21 in total

1.  Distinct requirements for somatic and germline expression of a generally expressed Caernorhabditis elegans gene.

Authors:  W G Kelly; S Xu; M K Montgomery; A Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X.

Authors:  F Jeanmougin; J D Thompson; M Gouy; D G Higgins; T J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Promoter trapping identifies real genes in C. elegans.

Authors:  I A Hope; J M Arnold; D McCarroll; G Jun; A P Krupa; R Herbert
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1998-11

4.  A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis.

Authors:  E L Sonnhammer; R Durbin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  The large srh family of chemoreceptor genes in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses.

Authors:  H M Robertson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Operons as a common form of chromosomal organization in C. elegans.

Authors:  D A Zorio; N N Cheng; T Blumenthal; J Spieth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Molecular markers of differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans obtained by promoter trapping.

Authors:  J M Young; I A Hope
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 8.  Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Developmental expression pattern screen for genes predicted in the C. elegans genome sequencing project.

Authors:  A S Lynch; D Briggs; I A Hope
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  'Promoter trapping' in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  I A Hope
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  27 in total

1.  Millions of years of evolution preserved: a comprehensive catalog of the processed pseudogenes in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhaolei Zhang; Paul M Harrison; Yin Liu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  A genome-wide survey of human pseudogenes.

Authors:  David Torrents; Mikita Suyama; Evgeny Zdobnov; Peer Bork
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Reevaluating human gene annotation: a second-generation analysis of chromosome 22.

Authors:  John E Collins; Melanie E Goward; Charlotte G Cole; Luc J Smink; Elizabeth J Huckle; Sarah Knowles; Jacqueline M Bye; David M Beare; Ian Dunham
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  An evolutionarily structured universe of protein architecture.

Authors:  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés; Derek Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Two alternative mechanisms that regulate the presentation of apoptotic cell engulfment signal in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Victor Venegas; Zheng Zhou
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Effect of dengue-2 virus infection on protein expression in the salivary glands of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.

Authors:  Daniel M Chisenhall; Berlin L Londono; Rebecca C Christofferson; Michael K McCracken; Christopher N Mores
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Feasibility of genome-scale construction of promoter::reporter gene fusions for expression in Caenorhabditis elegans using a multisite gateway recombination system.

Authors:  Ian A Hope; Jonathan Stevens; Anna Garner; Josie Hayes; David L Cheo; Michael A Brasch; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Epigenetic silencing may aid evolution by gene duplication.

Authors:  Sergei N Rodin; Arthur D Riggs
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  A phylogeny of caenorhabditis reveals frequent loss of introns during nematode evolution.

Authors:  Soochin Cho; Suk-Won Jin; Adam Cohen; Ronald E Ellis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The ABC transporter gene family of Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Armin Sturm; Phil Cunningham; Michael Dean
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.