Literature DB >> 9402735

Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

V L Bauer1, C F Aquadro.   

Abstract

To determine whether male- or female-biased mutation rates have affected the molecular evolution of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, we calculated the male-to-female ratio of germline cell divisions ([symbol: see text]) from germline generation data and the male-to-female ratio of mutation rate ([symbol: see text]) by comparing chromosomal levels of nucleotide divergence. We found that the ratio of germline cell divisions changes from indicating a weak female bias to indicating a weak male bias as the age of reproduction increases. The range of [symbol: see text] values that we observed, however, does not lead us to expect much, if any, difference in mutation rate between the sexes. Silent and intron nucleotide divergence were compared between nine loci on the X chromosome and nine loci on the second and third chromosomes. The average levels of nucleotide divergence were not significantly different across the chromosomes, although both silent and intron sites show a trend toward slightly more divergence on the X. These results indicate a lack of sex- or chromosome-biased molecular evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9402735     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  37 in total

1.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genome analyses substantiate male mutation bias in many species.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Evolutionary expressed sequence tag analysis of Drosophila female reproductive tracts identifies genes subjected to positive selection.

Authors:  Willie J Swanson; Alex Wong; Mariana F Wolfner; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins in abalone and Drosophila.

Authors:  Tami M Panhuis; Nathaniel L Clark; Willie J Swanson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Sperm competition can drive a male-biased mutation rate.

Authors:  Justin P Blumenstiel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Additivity and trans-acting effects on gene expression in male Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M L Wayne; Y-J Pan; S V Nuzhdin; L M McIntyre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The evolutionary analysis of "orphans" from the Drosophila genome identifies rapidly diverging and incorrectly annotated genes.

Authors:  K J Schmid; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.