Literature DB >> 9223264

Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.

J R Powell1, E N Moriyama.   

Abstract

We first review what is known about patterns of codon usage bias in Drosophila and make the following points: (i) Drosophila genes are as biased or more biased than those in microorganisms. (ii) The level of bias of genes and even the particular pattern of codon bias can remain phylogenetically invariant for very long periods of evolution. (iii) However, some genes, even very tightly linked genes, can change very greatly in codon bias across species. (iv) Generally G and especially C are favored at synonymous sites in biased genes. (v) With the exception of aspartic acid, all amino acids contribute significantly and about equally to the codon usage bias of a gene. (vi) While most individual amino acids that can use G or C at synonymous sites display a preference for C, there are exceptions: valine and leucine, which prefer G. (vii) Finally, smaller genes tend to be more biased than longer genes. We then examine possible causes of these patterns and discount mutation bias on three bases: there is little evidence of regional mutation bias in Drosophila, mutation bias is likely toward A+T (the opposite of codon usage bias), and not all amino acids display the preference for the same nucleotide in the wobble position. Two lines of evidence support a selection hypothesis based on tRNA pools: highly biased genes tend to be highly and/or rapidly expressed, and the preferred codons in highly biased genes optimally bind the most abundant isoaccepting tRNAs. Finally, we examine the effect of bias on DNA evolution and confirm that genes with high codon usage bias have lower rates of synonymous substitution between species than do genes with low codon usage bias. Surprisingly, we find that genes with higher codon usage bias display higher levels of intraspecific synonymous polymorphism. This may be due to opposing effects of recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9223264      PMCID: PMC33704          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause.

Authors:  S Aota; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-08-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Non-Darwinian evolution: a critique.

Authors:  R C Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes.

Authors:  M Sprinzl; C Steegborn; F Hübel; S Steinberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  An analysis of eukaryotic genomes by density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  J P Thiery; G Macaya; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Analysis of tRNAs during the development of Drosophila.

Authors:  B N White; G M Tener; J Holden; D T Suzuki
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates.

Authors:  G Bernardi; B Olofsson; J Filipski; M Zerial; J Salinas; G Cuny; M Meunier-Rotival; F Rodier
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

Authors:  H Grosjean; W Fiers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  119 in total

1.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution. Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; K A Dunn; Z Yang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The relationship between third-codon position nucleotide content, codon bias, mRNA secondary structure and gene expression in the drosophilid alcohol dehydrogenase genes Adh and Adhr.

Authors:  D B Carlini; Y Chen; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Compositional gradients in Gramineae genes.

Authors:  Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Jun Wang; Lin Tao; Jun Tan; JianGuo Zhang; Douglas A Passey; Jun Yu
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  PF-IND: probability algorithm and software for separation of plant and fungal sequences.

Authors:  R Maor; E Kosman; R Golobinski; P Goodwin; A Sharon
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.886

7.  Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Codon usage patterns in cytochrome oxidase I across multiple insect orders.

Authors:  Joshua T Herbeck; John Novembre
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Gene expression intensity shapes evolutionary rates of the proteins encoded by the vertebrate genome.

Authors:  Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The evolutionary analysis of "orphans" from the Drosophila genome identifies rapidly diverging and incorrectly annotated genes.

Authors:  K J Schmid; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.