Literature DB >> 11585291

Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET.

D Visvikis1, C Cheze-LeRest, D C Costa, J Bomanji, S Gacinovic, P J Ell.   

Abstract

Standardised Uptake Values (SUVs) are widely used in positron emission tomography (PET) as a semi-quantitative index of fluorine-18 labelled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. The objective of this study was to investigate any bias introduced in the calculation of SUVs as a result of employing ordered subsets-expectation maximisation (OSEM) image reconstruction and segmented attenuation correction (SAC). Variable emission and transmission time durations were investigated. Both a phantom and a clinical evaluation of the bias were carried out. The software implemented in the GE Advance PET scanner was used. Phantom studies simulating tumour imaging conditions were performed. Since a variable count rate may influence the results obtained using OSEM, similar acquisitions were performed at total count rates of 34 kcps and 12 kcps. Clinical data consisted of 100 patient studies. Emission datasets of 5 and 15 min duration were combined with 15-, 3-, 2- and 1-min transmission datasets for the reconstruction of both phantom and patient studies. Two SUVs were estimated using the average (SUVavg) and the maximum (SUVmax) count density from regions of interest placed well inside structures of interest. The percentage bias of these SUVs compared with the values obtained using a reference image was calculated. The reference image was considered to be the one produced by filtered back-projection (FBP) image reconstruction with measured attenuation correction using the 15-min emission and transmission datasets for each phantom and patient study. A bias of 5%-20% was found for the SUVavg and SUVmax in the case of FBP with SAC using variable transmission times. In the case of OSEM with SAC, the bias increased to 10%-30%. An overall increase of 5%-10% was observed with the use of SUVmax. The 5-min emission dataset led to an increase in the bias of 25%-100%, with the larger increase recorded for the SUVmax. The results suggest that OSEM and SAC with 3 and 2 min transmission may be reliably used to reduce the overall data acquisition time without compromising the accuracy of SUVs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11585291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  13 in total

Review 1.  Impact of technology on the utilisation of positron emission tomography in lymphoma: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  D Visvikis; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Yusuf E Erdi; Steven M Larson; Henry W D Yeung
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Feasibility study of the use of similarity maps in the evaluation of oncological dynamic positron emission tomography images.

Authors:  T Thireou; G Kontaxakis; L G Strauss; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; S Pavlopoulos; A Santos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Fuzzy hidden Markov chains segmentation for volume determination and quantitation in PET.

Authors:  M Hatt; F Lamare; N Boussion; A Turzo; C Collet; F Salzenstein; C Roux; P Jarritt; K Carson; C Cheze-Le Rest; D Visvikis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A thiol-reactive 18F-labeling agent, N-[2-(4-18F-fluorobenzamido)ethyl]maleimide, and synthesis of RGD peptide-based tracer for PET imaging of alpha v beta 3 integrin expression.

Authors:  Weibo Cai; Xianzhong Zhang; Yun Wu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D Griffiths; D C Costa; J Bomanji; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies.

Authors:  Dennis Vriens; Eric P Visser; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Comparison of methodologies for the in vivo assessment of 18FLT utilisation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D Francis; R Mulligan; D C Costa; I Croasdale; S K Luthra; I Taylor; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner.

Authors:  Tung-Hsin Wu; Yung-Hui Huang; Jason J S Lee; Shih-Yuan Wang; Su-Cheng Wang; Cheng-Tau Su; Liang-Kung Chen; Tieh-Chi Chu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  68Ga-chloride PET reveals human pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts in rats--comparison with FDG.

Authors:  Tiina Ujula; Satu Salomäki; Anu Autio; Pauliina Luoto; Tuula Tolvanen; Pertti Lehikoinen; Tapio Viljanen; Hannu Sipilä; Pirkko Härkönen; Anne Roivainen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.