Literature DB >> 14534833

Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner.

Tung-Hsin Wu1, Yung-Hui Huang, Jason J S Lee, Shih-Yuan Wang, Su-Cheng Wang, Cheng-Tau Su, Liang-Kung Chen, Tieh-Chi Chu.   

Abstract

In positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning, transmission measurements for attenuation correction are commonly performed by using external germanium-68 rod sources. Recently, combined PET and computed tomographic (CT) scanners have been developed in which the CT data can be used for both anatomical-metabolic image formation and attenuation correction of the PET data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between germanium- and CT-based transmission scanning in terms of their radiation doses by using the same measurement technique and to compare the doses that patients receive during brain, cardiac and whole-body scans. Measurement of absorbed doses to organs was conducted by using a Rando Alderson phantom with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Effective doses were calculated according to the guidelines in the International Commission on Radiation Protection Publication Number 60. Compared with radionuclide doses used in routine 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET imaging, doses absorbed during germanium-based transmission scans were almost negligible. On the other hand, absorbed doses from CT-based transmission scans were significantly higher, particularly with a whole-body scanning protocol. Effective doses were 8.81 mSv in the high-speed mode and 18.97 mSv in the high-quality mode for whole-body CT-based transmission scans. These measurements revealed that the doses received by a patient during CT-based transmission scanning are more than those received in a typical PET examination. Therefore, the radiation doses represent a limitation to the generalised use of CT-based transmission measurements with current PET/CT scanner systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534833     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1327-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

Review 1.  Transmission scanning in emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-07

2.  Effect of attenuation correction on myocardial thallium-201 distribution in patients with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E M Prvulovich; A H Lonn; J B Bomanji; P H Jarritt; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-03

3.  Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Impact on Patient Management.

Authors:  P G. Kluetz; C C. Meltzer; V L. Villemagne; P E. Kinahan; S Chander; M A. Martinelli; D W. Townsend
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  2000-11

4.  Radiation dose to the bladder wall from 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in adult humans.

Authors:  M T Dowd; C T Chen; M J Wendel; P J Faulhaber; M D Cooper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Whole-body positron emission tomography in clinical oncology: comparison between attenuation-corrected and uncorrected images.

Authors:  F M Bengel; S I Ziegler; N Avril; W Weber; C Laubenbacher; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-09

6.  Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner.

Authors:  M Charron; T Beyer; N N Bohnen; P E Kinahan; M Dachille; J Jerin; R Nutt; C C Meltzer; V Villemagne; D W Townsend
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  Internal absorbed dose estimation by a TLD method for 18F-FDG and comparison with the dose estimates from whole body PET.

Authors:  H M Deloar; T Fujiwara; M Shidahara; T Nakamura; A Yamadera; M Itoh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Medhat Osman; Christian Cohade; Laura T Marshall; Jonathan M Links; Steve Kohlmyer; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Combined functional and structural evaluation of cancer patients with a hybrid camera-based PET/CT system using (18)F-FDG.

Authors:  Ora Israel; Maya Mor; Diana Gaitini; Zohar Keidar; Luda Guralnik; Ahuva Engel; Alex Frenkel; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Abraham Kuten
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  19 in total

1.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data.

Authors:  V Schulz; I Torres-Espallardo; S Renisch; Z Hu; N Ojha; P Börnert; M Perkuhn; T Niendorf; W M Schäfer; H Brockmann; T Krohn; A Buhl; R W Günther; F M Mottaghy; G A Krombach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Is PET/CT necessary in paediatric oncology? For.

Authors:  Christiane Franzius; Kai Uwe Juergens; Otmar Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac nuclear and radiography procedures.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT with three different CT protocols: a comparison with conventional PET.

Authors:  Michael Souvatzoglou; Frank Bengel; Raymonde Busch; Coletta Kruschke; Helga Fernolendt; Denise Lee; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Respiratory motion handling is mandatory to accomplish the high-resolution PET destiny.

Authors:  Doumit Daou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [18F]FDG, version 2.

Authors:  Andrea Varrone; Susanne Asenbaum; Thierry Vander Borght; Jan Booij; Flavio Nobili; Kjell Någren; Jacques Darcourt; Ozlem L Kapucu; Klaus Tatsch; Peter Bartenstein; Koen Van Laere
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Status of cardiovascular PET radiation exposure and strategies for reduction: An Information Statement from the Cardiovascular PET Task Force.

Authors:  James A Case; Robert A deKemp; Piotr J Slomka; Mark F Smith; Gary V Heller; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  CT dose modulation using automatic exposure control in whole-body PET/CT: effects of scout imaging direction and arm positioning.

Authors:  Yusuke Inoue; Kazunori Nagahara; Hiroko Kudo; Hiroyasu Itoh
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

9.  Improvement of attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR imaging with a positron-emitting source.

Authors:  Pieter Mollet; Vincent Keereman; Jason Bini; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Zahi A Fayad; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  On the added value of baseline FDG-PET in malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Henriette Quarles van Ufford; Otto Hoekstra; Marie de Haas; Rob Fijnheer; Shulamiet Wittebol; Bianca Tieks; Mark Kramer; John de Klerk
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.