Literature DB >> 12748830

Impact of technology on the utilisation of positron emission tomography in lymphoma: current and future perspectives.

D Visvikis1, P J Ell.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) has now gained a place in the management of patients with cancer, including those with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Restaging studies and those addressing the monitoring of response to treatment are especially in focus. Most of the knowledge gained has been achieved with dedicated BGO-based PET technology, but there are a number of developments that will impact on the use of this metabolic imaging technique in the investigation of patients with lymphoma. The challenges ahead are determined by the need for high-quality whole-body imaging associated with increased patient throughput and the need to investigate the role of new labelled ligands. The latter are likely to yield new insights into tumour cell characterisation, tumour behaviour and tumour outcome assessment. The study of new radiolabelled ligands will impose further demands for rapid dynamic data acquisition and accurate tracer quantification. Current and future developments in PET technology range from the use of new detector materials to different detector geometries and data acquisition modes. The search for alternatives to BGO scintillation materials for PET has led to the development of PET instruments utilising new crystals such as LSO and GSO. The use of these new detectors and the increased sensitivity achieved with 3D data acquisitions represent the most significant current developments in the field. With the increasing demands imposed on the clinical utilisation of PET, issues such as study cost and patient throughput will emerge as significant future factors. As a consequence, low-cost units are being offered by the manufacturers through the utilisation of gamma camera-based SPET systems for PET coincidence imaging. Unfortunately, clinical studies in lymphoma and other cancers have already demonstrated the limitations of this technology, with 20% of lesions <15 mm in size escaping detection. On the other hand, the recent development of combined PET/CT devices attempts to address the lack of anatomical information inherent with PET images, taking advantage of further improvement in patient throughput and hence cost-effectiveness. Preliminary studies using this multimodality imaging approach have already demonstrated the potential of the technique. Although the potential exists, certain technical issues with PET/CT require refinement of the methodology. Such issues include organ movement (such as respiratory motion), which strongly influences the image fusion of a rapidly acquired CT scan with the slower acquisition of a PET dataset, and the derivation of CT-based attenuation coefficients in the presence of contrast agents or metallic implants. The application of the technology for radiotherapy planning also poses a number of associated challenges. Finally, the development of dedicated PET systems based on planar detector arrangements with new detector components has the potential to improve clinical throughput by over 100%, but clinical trials using such systems have still to be carried out in order to establish the associated whole-body image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748830     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1168-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  36 in total

1.  A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner.

Authors:  R B Slates; K Farahani; Y Shao; P K Marsden; J Taylor; P E Summers; S Williams; J Beech; S R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and 67Ga scan versus computed tomography in the staging and in the monitoring of mediastinal malignant lymphoma: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  M Bendini; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi; G Dalpiaz; F Zaja; E Englaro
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body positron tomograph.

Authors:  T J Spinks; R Guzzardi; C R Bellina
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Feasibility of fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head gamma camera coincidence imaging in the evaluation of lung cancer: comparison with FDG PET.

Authors:  M Tatsumi; K Yutani; Y Watanabe; S Miyoshi; N Tomiyama; T Johkoh; H Kusuoka; H Nakamura; T Nishimura
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Simultaneous PET and MR imaging.

Authors:  Y Shao; S R Cherry; K Farahani; K Meadors; S Siegel; R W Silverman; P K Marsden
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Comparison of FDG PET and positron coincidence detection imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with 5/8-inch NaI(Tl) crystals in patients with suspected body malignancies.

Authors:  E L Boren; D Delbeke; J A Patton; M P Sandler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-04

8.  Comparison of dual-head coincidence PET versus ring PET in tumor patients.

Authors:  C Landoni; L Gianolli; G Lucignani; P Magnani; A Savi; L Travaini; M C Gilardi; F Fazio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  "Anatometabolic" tumor imaging: fusion of FDG PET with CT or MRI to localize foci of increased activity.

Authors:  R L Wahl; L E Quint; R D Cieslak; A M Aisen; R A Koeppe; C R Meyer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  ECAT: a new computerized tomographic imaging system for positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; S C Huang; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography in the management of lymphomas: a summary.

Authors:  M J O'Doherty; P J Hoskin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Highlights of the Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Helsinki 2004, and a dash of horizon scanning.

Authors:  Peter J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  [Combined Scanners (PET/CT, SPECT/CT) Versus Multimodality Imaging with Separated Systems].

Authors:  T Pfluger; C la Fougère; J Stauss; R Santos; C Vollmar; K Hahn
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients.

Authors:  P L Zinzani; S Fanti; G Battista; M Tani; P Castellucci; V Stefoni; L Alinari; M Farsad; G Musuraca; A Gabriele; E Marchi; C Nanni; R Canini; N Monetti; M Baccarani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Clinical application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment and evaluation after therapy for malignant hepatic tumor.

Authors:  Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Masahiko Okada; Hiroyuki Kuroda; Mitsuru Matsuki; Kazunari Ishii; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  On transcending the impasse of respiratory motion correction applications in routine clinical imaging - a consideration of a fully automated data driven motion control framework.

Authors:  Adam L Kesner; Paul J Schleyer; Florian Büther; Martin A Walter; Klaus P Schäfers; Phillip J Koo
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.