Literature DB >> 19936745

Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies.

Dennis Vriens1, Eric P Visser, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, Wim J G Oyen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and research.
METHODS: Structural PubMed searches have been performed for the many factors affecting quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Review articles and references lists have been used to supplement the search findings.
RESULTS: Biological factors such as fasting blood glucose level, FDG uptake period, FDG distribution and clearance, patient motion (breathing) and patient discomfort (stress) all influence quantification. Acquisition parameters should be adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio without exposing the patient to a higher than strictly necessary radiation dose. This is especially challenging in pharmacokinetic analysis, where the temporal resolution is of significant importance. The literature is reviewed on the influence of attenuation correction on parameters for glucose metabolism, the effect of motion, metal artefacts and contrast agents on quantification of CT attenuation-corrected images. Reconstruction settings (analytical versus iterative reconstruction, post-reconstruction filtering and image matrix size) all potentially influence quantification due to artefacts, noise levels and lesion size dependency. Many region of interest definitions are available, but increased complexity does not necessarily result in improved performance. Different methods for the quantification of the tissue of interest can introduce systematic and random inaccuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an up-to-date overview of the many factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936745      PMCID: PMC2886126          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1306-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  112 in total

1.  The FDG lumped constant in normal human brain.

Authors:  Michael M Graham; Mark Muzi; Alexander M Spence; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Thomas K Lewellen; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; R Boellaard; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Corneline J Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Cascades of pile-up and dead time.

Authors:  S Pommé
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients.

Authors:  A K Berthelsen; S Holm; A Loft; T L Klausen; F Andersen; L Højgaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F-18)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: validation of method.

Authors:  M E Phelps; S C Huang; E J Hoffman; C Selin; L Sokoloff; D E Kuhl
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Chemotherapy response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henricus F M van der Heijden; Eric P Visser; Rick Hermsen; Bas A van Hoorn; Johanna N H Timmer-Bonte; Antoon T Willemsen; Jan Pruim; Frans H M Corstens; Paul F M Krabbe; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours.

Authors:  N Sadato; T Tsuchida; S Nakaumra; A Waki; H Uematsu; N Takahashi; N Hayashi; Y Yonekura; Y Ishii
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-06

8.  Glucose metabolic rate kinetic model parameter determination in humans: the lumped constants and rate constants for [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and [11C]deoxyglucose.

Authors:  M Reivich; A Alavi; A Wolf; J Fowler; J Russell; C Arnett; R R MacGregor; C Y Shiue; H Atkins; A Anand
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma?

Authors:  Pierre Vera; Matthieu John Ouvrier; Sébastien Hapdey; Marc Thillays; Anne Sophie Pesquet; Brigitte Diologent; Françoise Callonec; Anne Hitzel; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Jean François Ménard; Fabrice Jardin; Hervé Tilly
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D C Costa; I Croasdale; A H R Lonn; J Bomanji; S Gacinovic; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  38 in total

1.  Recommendations for the use of PET and PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in research projects.

Authors:  E J Somer; L C Pike; P K Marsden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  EANM Dosimetry Committee guidance document: good practice of clinical dosimetry reporting.

Authors:  M Lassmann; C Chiesa; G Flux; M Bardiès
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Positron emission tomography imaging approaches for external beam radiation therapies: current status and future developments.

Authors:  P M Price; M M Green
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Hannah M Linden; Alena Novakova; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters to Predict Prognosis in Patients With HPV-Positive Primary Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Esther Mena; Mehdi Taghipour; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Abhinav K Jha; Arman Rahmim; Lilja Solnes; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Wouter van der Bruggen; Marlous Hagelstein-Rotman; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Frits Smit; P D Sander Dijkstra; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Dennis Vriens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT.

Authors:  Marco Wiesmüller; Harald H Quick; Bharath Navalpakkam; Michael M Lell; Michael Uder; Philipp Ritt; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Torsten Kuwert; Carl C von Gall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Meditative music listening to reduce state anxiety in patients during the uptake phase before positron emission tomography (PET) scans.

Authors:  Wen-Li Lee; Huei-Chuan Sung; Shu-Hsin Liu; Shu-Min Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Metabolic Subtyping of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma by 18F-FDG Pharmacokinetics Using Dynamic PET/CT Scanning.

Authors:  Anouk van Berkel; Dennis Vriens; Eric P Visser; Marcel J R Janssen; Martin Gotthardt; Ad R M M Hermus; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henri J L M Timmers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; N George Mikhaeel; Lale Kostakoglu; Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Stefan P Müeller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; Richard I Fisher; Judith Trotman; Otto S Hoekstra; Rodney J Hicks; Michael J O'Doherty; Roland Hustinx; Alberto Biggi; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.