Literature DB >> 9602623

Multifocal electroretinography in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy.

U Kretschmann1, M W Seeliger, K Ruether, T Usui, E Apfelstedt-Sylla, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe the topography of multifocal electroretinograms (ERGs) and to explore its diagnostic value in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy (SMD).
METHODS: 51 patients with SMD were examined by means of the m-sequence technique to characterise the topography of electroretinographic responses in the central visual field. The results were compared with data from 30 normal volunteers.
RESULTS: In 49 of 51 patients with SMD, macular electroretinographic activity was markedly diminished or non-detectable. Towards more peripheral areas, ERG responses of the SMD patients approached those of normals. Implicit times were not markedly delayed at any eccentricity.
CONCLUSION: In contrast with Ganzfeld electroretinography, multifocal electroretinography is useful to detect foveal dysfunction in SMD. Areas of dysfunction were found to be usually larger than expected from psychophysical measurements and morphological alteration. In early stages of the disease it was possible to detect foveal dysfunction, even in patients lacking morphological fundus changes and with good visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9602623      PMCID: PMC1722507          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.3.267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  23 in total

1.  Electroretinographic campimetry in a patient with crystalline retinopathy.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; T Usui; K Ruether; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11

2.  ERG campimetry using a multi-input stimulation technique for mapping of retinal function in the central visual field.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; K Rüther; T Usui; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Focal cone electroretinograms in dominant retinitis pigmentosa with reduced penetrance.

Authors:  M A Sandlberg; M H Effron; E L Berson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Fundus flavimaculatus. Clinical, functional and histopathologic observations.

Authors:  B A Klien; A E Krill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  A photoreceptor cell-specific ATP-binding transporter gene (ABCR) is mutated in recessive Stargardt macular dystrophy.

Authors:  R Allikmets; N Singh; H Sun; N F Shroyer; A Hutchinson; A Chidambaram; B Gerrard; L Baird; D Stauffer; A Peiffer; A Rattner; P Smallwood; Y Li; K L Anderson; R A Lewis; J Nathans; M Leppert; M Dean; J R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus.

Authors:  K G Noble; R E Carr
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-07

7.  Retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in fundus flavimaculatus: a light and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  R C Eagle; A C Lucier; V B Bernardino; M Yanoff
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Fundus flavimaculatus. A clinical classification.

Authors:  G A Fishman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-12

9.  Fundus flavimaculatus without maculopathy. A clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  P J McDonnell; J D Kivlin; I H Maumenee; W R Green
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Foveal cone electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa and juvenile maular degeneration.

Authors:  M A Sandberg; S G Jacobson; E L Berson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  19 in total

1.  Impact of notch filter use on waveforms of First- and Second-Order-Kernel responses from multifocal ERGs.

Authors:  M Bock; C Gerth; B Lorenz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Continuous monitoring of the stimulated area in multifocal ERG.

Authors: 
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes.

Authors:  D C Hood; X Zhang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography.

Authors:  U Kretschmann; M Bock; R Gockeln; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Assessment of local cone on- and off-pathway function using multifocal ERG technique.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The impact of fixation on the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  J A Chisholm; D Keating; S Parks; A L Evans
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  [Scanning laser ophthalmoscope multifocal electroretinography and microperimetry in patients with Stargardt's disease].

Authors:  G Rudolph; P Kalpadakis; O Ehrt; T Berninger; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  A comparison of pattern and multifocal electroretinography in the evaluation of age-related macular degeneration and its treatment with photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Magella M Neveu; Adnan Tufail; Jonathan G Dowler; Graham E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Novel rhodopsin mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  A Schuster; N Weisschuh; H Jägle; D Besch; A R Janecke; H Zierler; S Tippmann; E Zrenner; B Wissinger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Examination of short binary sequences for mfERG recording.

Authors:  Richard P Hagan; Anthony C Fisher; Malcolm C Brown
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.