Literature DB >> 16917767

Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.

Qi Chen1, Ming Zhang, Xiaolin Zhou.   

Abstract

Using a cue-target paradigm, this study investigated the interaction between location and frequency information processing in human auditory inhibition of return (IOR). The cue and the target varied in terms of location and frequency and participants were asked to perform a target detection, localization or frequency discrimination task. Results showed that, when neither location nor frequency of auditory stimuli was particularly relevant to the target detection task, there was a location-based IOR only if the cue and the target were identical in frequency and there was a frequency-based IOR only if the cue and the target were presented at the same location. When a particular feature of auditory stimuli, whether location or frequency, was directly relevant to the current task, the IOR effect was evident for this feature only if the cue and the target differed on the task-irrelevant feature, while the IOR effect was eliminated for the task-relevant feature when the cue and the target had the same task-irrelevant feature. Similarly, the IOR effect based on the task-irrelevant feature was evident when the cue and the target differed on the task-relevant feature, and was eliminated or reversed when the cue and the target shared the task-relevant feature. Theoretical implications of these findings for auditory IOR are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917767     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0642-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  46 in total

1.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.

Authors:  T L Taylor; R M Klein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

4.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

5.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.

Authors:  H W Kwak; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

6.  Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.

Authors:  C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

7.  What is inhibited in inhibition of return?

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; A P Jha; J N Rosenquist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks.

Authors:  J Pratt; A Kingstone; W Khoe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-08

9.  Spatial and nonspatial peripheral auditory processing in congenitally blind people.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Ming Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biasing the organism for novelty: A pervasive property of the attention system.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Luis J Fuentes; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Dissociable identity- and modality-specific neural representations as revealed by cross-modal nonspatial inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yukai Chi; Zhenzhu Yue; Yupin Liu; Lei Mo; Qi Chen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Same, but different: Binding effects in auditory, but not visual detection performance.

Authors:  Lars-Michael Schöpper; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Functional neuroanatomy of spatial sound processing in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hannah L Golden; Jennifer L Agustus; Jennifer M Nicholas; Jonathan M Schott; Sebastian J Crutch; Laura Mancini; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.673

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.