Literature DB >> 19679871

Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.

Jong Moon Choi1, Yang Seok Cho, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

A Stroop task with separate color bar and color word stimuli was combined with an inhibition-of-return procedure to examine whether visual attention modulates color word processing. In Experiment 1, the color bar was presented at the cued location and the color word at the uncued location, or vice versa, with a 100- or 1,050-msec stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between cue and Stroop stimuli. In Experiment 2, on Stroop trials, the color bar was presented at a central fixated location and the color word at a cued or uncued location above or below the color bar. In both experiments, with a 100-msec SOA, the Stroop effect was numerically larger when the color word was displayed at the cued location than when it was displayed at the uncued location, but with the 1,050-msec SOA, this relation between Stroop effect magnitude and location was reversed. These results provide evidence that processing of the color word in the Stroop task is modulated by the location to which visual attention is directed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679871     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.6.935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02

2.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

3.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Agnes Moors; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

8.  Automaticity and word perception: evidence from Stroop and Stroop dilution effects.

Authors:  T L Brown; L Roos-Gilbert; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  D Kahneman; D Chajczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

Authors:  M O Glaser; W R Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Stroop-matching task as a tool to study the correspondence effect using images of graspable and non-graspable objects.

Authors:  Ariane Leão Caldas; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Olga Daneyko; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.