Literature DB >> 17694920

Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return: evidence from flanker interference with multiple distractor features.

Ana B Vivas1, Luis J Fuentes, Angeles F Estevez, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Fuentes, Vivas, and Humphreys (1999) proposed a distinction between inhibition of return (IOR) and inhibitory processing taking place at a location subject to IOR. This latter mechanism, inhibitory tagging (IT), would act at a late level of processing related to response selection. In the present study, we examined whether IT was applied only to the target-relevant properties of the stimuli (e.g., to its color) or whether it was applied to other features of the stimulus as well (e.g., to its shape). Both when the task was to respond to the target's color (Experiment 1) as well as when it was to respond to the target's shape (Experiment 2), there was evidence of IT (reversal of the typical flanker effect at the cued location, relative to the uncued location) only to task-relevant features of the target. These findings suggest that IT is a central process of control constrained by task demands and current goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694920     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?

Authors:  J J Snyder; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.

Authors:  A B Vivas; L J Fuentes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

3.  Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: an omnibus analysis and its implications.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

4.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.

Authors:  Y Takeda; A Yagi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

5.  Covert orienting to the locations of targets and distractors: effects on response channel activation in a flanker task.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Liana Machado; Nancy Kanwisher; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-07

6.  Differential age effects on attention-based inhibition: inhibitory tagging and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Ana B Vivas; Luis J Fuentes; Angela G Bagne
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-06

7.  Visual extinction and stimulus repetition.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver; R D Rafal
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995).

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; F L Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return is affected in schizophrenia: evidence from the stroop task.

Authors:  L J Fuentes; M Boucart; A B Vivas; R Alvarez; M A Zimmerman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Glyn W Humphreys; Luis J Fuentes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Aijun Wang; Zhenzhu Yue; Ming Zhang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A new mother-child play activity program to decrease parenting stress and improve child cognitive abilities: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Tachibana; Ai Fukushima; Hitomi Saito; Satoshi Yoneyama; Kazuo Ushida; Susumu Yoneyama; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Behavioral and neural interaction between spatial inhibition of return and the Simon effect.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Luis J Fuentes; Ana B Vivas; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.