Literature DB >> 11451112

Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

K Hirakawa1, N Mitsugi, T Koshino, T Saito, Y Hirasawa, T Kubo.   

Abstract

Long-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty for patients with developmental acetabular dysplasia of the hip have been reported, but placement of the femoral head center or cup orientation remains controversial, especially with a severe anterolateral shallow acetabulum or dislocated femoral head. Results of 41 Müller and 34 Harris Design 2 cemented total hip arthroplasties were evaluated for developmental dysplasia of the hip. The femoral head center and acetabular cup inclination angle were measured from the interteardrop line. Linear wear and wear direction were measured using the Livermore technique. The best position of the femoral head center was less than 35 mm vertically from the interteardrop line and 25 mm laterally from the teardrop. Femoral head center analysis showed that hips with the cup in a lateral and superior cup position all were revised, but a superior and medial position combined with a cup inclination angle less than 40 degrees did not require revision. Hips with a cup inclination angle more than 45 degrees had superior and lateral penetration patterns of the polyethylene. However, hips with an inclination angle less than 35 degrees and medial placement had medial head penetration patterns. With these all-polyethylene monolithic cemented cups, regardless of the femoral head diameter or cup thickness, better long-term results occurred with a cup inclination angle of 40 degrees or less and medial position of the cup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451112     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].

Authors:  J Von Recum; K Wendl; J Korber; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?

Authors:  Benjamin McArthur; Michael Cross; Christina Geatrakas; David Mayman; Bernard Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation.

Authors:  S Shankar; K Gowthaman; M S Uddin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  [Size analysis and the reference area of acetabulum-prosthesis-transplantation in different body positions. ].

Authors:  Hui Zeng; Eckart Mayr; Bin Kang; Ao Xiong; Feng Xin; Michael Nogler; Martin Krismer
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2006

Review 5.  [Musculoskeletal load analysis. A biomechanical explanation for clinical results--and more?].

Authors:  M O Heller; J H Schröder; G Matziolis; A Sharenkov; W R Taylor; C Perka; G N Duda
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Navigated non-image-based positioning of the acetabulum during total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri; Jean-Claude Dosch; Marius Uscatu; Eugen Ciobanu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Navigation in hip joint revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  P A Grützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Cementless acetabular component with or without upward placement in dysplasia hip: Early results from a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Zhiqi Zhang; Peihui Wu; Zhiyu Huang; Baoxi Yu; Hong Sun; Ming Fu; Yan Kang; Weiming Liao
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-27

10.  Results of total hip arthroplasty differ in subtypes of high dislocation.

Authors:  George Hartofilakidis; George C Babis; Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou; John Vlamis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.