Literature DB >> 11451111

Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

D P Sakalkale1, P F Sharkey, K Eng, W J Hozack, R H Rothman.   

Abstract

Seventeen staged, bilateral total hip arthroplasties performed in 17 patients were reviewed to compare side-to-side polyethylene wear. Implants used on both sides were similar except for implant offset: one hip in each patient was replaced using a femoral component having a standard implant offset, whereas the other side had a lateral offset implant. The mean followup was 5.70 years (range, 2-10.2 years) on the side with a standard femoral implant and 5.67 years (range, 2-9.7 years) on the side with a lateralized femoral component. The only statistically different parameter between the sides was the femoral component offset. All other parameters affecting polyethylene wear, such as period of followup, head size, head type, cup size, cup inclination, medialization of cup, and patient-related factors were similar on both sides. On the side with a standard femoral component, the mean actual prosthetic offset (determined by manufacturer's specifications) was 35.2 mm and the radiologic offset was 31.5 mm. On the side with a lateralized femoral component, the actual prosthetic offset was 42.5 mm and the radiologic offset was 40.1 mm. The difference in offsets between the sides was statistically significant. The mean preoperative offset of the femur was 38.8 mm. Regression analysis revealed that only femoral component offset and cup size correlated significantly with linear wear rate. On the side with a standard femoral component, the linear wear rate was 0.21 mm per year, whereas on the side with a lateralized femoral component, the linear wear rate was 0.10 mm per year. The differences in the linear wear rates were significant. Lateralization of the femoral component in this series more closely restored preoperative hip biomechanics and significantly decreased polyethylene wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451111     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  67 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating.

Authors:  Massimiliano Marcucci; Pier Francesco Indelli; Leonardo Latella; Paolo Poli; Devin King
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Leg length and offset measures with a pinless femoral reference array during THA.

Authors:  Tobias Renkawitz; Tibor Schuster; Joachim Grifka; Thomas Kalteis; Ernst Sendtner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform.

Authors:  Rupesh Tarwala; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

6.  The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Georg Duda; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Christoph Kolja Boese; Verena Anna Bergmeister; Michael Frink; Steffen Ruchholtz; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Anne-Sophie Muller; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Millerioux; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Preoperative digital planning versus postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using a calcar-guided short stem: frequent valgization can be avoided.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil; Mark Predrag Kovacevic
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-08

10.  Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Matej Daniel; Douglas R Pedersen; Bhupinder Singh; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.