Literature DB >> 28391517

Preoperative digital planning versus postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using a calcar-guided short stem: frequent valgization can be avoided.

Karl Philipp Kutzner1, Joachim Pfeil2, Mark Predrag Kovacevic3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Modern total hip arthroplasty is largely dependent on the successful preservation of hip geometry. Thus, a successful implementation of the preoperative planning is of great importance. The present study evaluates the accuracy of anatomic hip reconstruction predicted by 2D digital planning using a calcar-guided short stem of the newest generation.
METHODS: A calcar-guided short stem was implanted in 109 patients in combination with a cementless cup using the modified anterolateral approach. Preoperative digital planning was performed including implant size, caput-collum-diaphyseal angle, offset, and leg length using mediCAD II software. A coordinate system and individual scale factors were implemented. Postoperative outcome was evaluated accordingly and was compared to the planning.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively used stem sizes were within one unit of the planned stem sizes. The postoperative stem alignment showed a minor and insignificant (p = 0.159) mean valgization of 0.5° (SD 3.79°) compared to the planned caput-collum-diaphyseal angles. Compared to the planning, mean femoral offset gained 2.18 (SD 4.24) mm, while acetabular offset was reduced by 0.78 (SD 4.36) mm during implantation resulting in an increased global offset of 1.40 (SD 5.51) mm (p = 0.0094). Postoperative femoroacetabular height increased by a mean of 5.00 (SD 5.98) mm (p < 0.0001) compared to preoperative measures. DISCUSSION: Two-dimensional digital preoperative planning in calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty assures a satisfying implementation of the intended anatomy. Valgization, which has been frequently observed in previous short-stem designs, negatively affecting offset, can be avoided. However, surgeons have to be aware of a possible leg lengthening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital planning; Offset; Optimys; Short stem; Stem alignment; Total hip arthroplasty; Valgization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391517     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1948-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kuen Tak Suh; Sang Jin Cheon; Dae Woong Kim
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

Review 2.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Douglas E Padgett; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  10-year experience with short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gabriela von Lewinski; Thilo Floerkemeier
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Gastón Slullitel; Francisco Piccaluga; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D P Sakalkale; P F Sharkey; K Eng; W J Hozack; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees.

Authors:  Bertram The; Ron L Diercks; Peter M A van Ooijen; Jim R van Horn
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  6 in total

1.  Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Anne-Sophie Muller; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Millerioux; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Using standard-length compactors to implant short humeral stems in total shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaver study of humeral stem alignment.

Authors:  Stanislas Gunst; Ana Nigues; Jérôme Vogels; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig; Laurent Nove-Josserand; Philippe Collotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Georgios Gkagkalis; Patrick Goetti; Sabine Mai; Ingmar Meinecke; Näder Helmy; Dominique Bosson; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Femoroacetabular offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty; Digital templating a short stem vs a conventional stem.

Authors:  Sheryl de Waard; Tom Verboom; Niels Hendrik Bech; Inger N Sierevelt; Gino M Kerkhoffs; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Mid-term results of a new-generation calcar-guided short stem in THA: clinical and radiological 5-year follow-up of 216 cases.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Stefanie Donner; Lennard Loweg; Philipp Rehbein; Jens Dargel; Philipp Drees; Joachim Pfeil
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.