Literature DB >> 19139001

Longitudinal assessment of air conduction audiograms in a phase III clinical trial of difluoromethylornithine and sulindac for prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas.

Christine E McLaren1, Sharon Fujikawa-Brooks, Wen-Pin Chen, Daniel L Gillen, Daniel Pelot, Eugene W Gerner, Frank L Meyskens.   

Abstract

A phase III clinical trial assessed the recurrence of adenomatous polyps after treatment for 36 months with difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) plus sulindac or matched placebos. Temporary hearing loss is a known toxicity of treatment with DFMO, thus a comprehensive approach was developed to analyze serial air conduction audiograms. The generalized estimating equation method estimated the mean difference between treatment arms with regard to change in air conduction pure tone thresholds while accounting for within-subject correlation due to repeated measurements at frequencies. Based on 290 subjects, there was an average difference of 0.50 dB between subjects treated with DFMO plus sulindac compared with those treated with placebo (95% confidence interval, -0.64 to 1.63 dB; P = 0.39), adjusted for baseline values, age, and frequencies. In the normal speech range of 500 to 3,000 Hz, an estimated difference of 0.99 dB (-0.17 to 2.14 dB; P = 0.09) was detected. Dose intensity did not add information to models. There were 14 of 151 (9.3%) in the DFMO plus sulindac group and 4 of 139 (2.9%) in the placebo group who experienced at least 15 dB hearing reduction from baseline in 2 or more consecutive frequencies across the entire range tested (P = 0.02). Follow-up air conduction done at least 6 months after end of treatment showed an adjusted mean difference in hearing thresholds of 1.08 dB (-0.81 to 2.96 dB; P = 0.26) between treatment arms. There was no significant difference in the proportion of subjects in the DFMO plus sulindac group who experienced clinically significant hearing loss compared with the placebo group. The estimated attributable risk of ototoxicity from exposure to the drug is 8.4% (95% confidence interval, -2.0% to 18.8%; P = 0.12). There is a <2 dB difference in mean threshold for patients treated with DFMO plus sulindac compared with those treated with placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19139001      PMCID: PMC2702261          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  29 in total

1.  Summarizing the goodness of fit of generalized linear models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  B Zheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Influence of K-ras activation on the survival responses of Caco-2 cells to the chemopreventive agents sulindac and difluoromethylornithine.

Authors:  K R Lawson; N A Ignatenko; G A Piazza; H Cui; E W Gerner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A retrospective study of the hearing results obtained after stapedotomy by the implantation of two Teflon pistons with a different diameter.

Authors:  W Grolman; R A Tange; A J de Bruijn; A A Hart; P F Schouwenburg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  alpha-difluoromethylornithine ototoxicity. Chemoprevention clinical trial results.

Authors:  T R Pasic; D Heisey; R R Love
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-12

5.  Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level.

Authors:  C H Morrell; S Gordon-Salant; J D Pearson; L J Brant; J L Fozard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise.

Authors:  G Rösler
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1994

Review 7.  Ototoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  V G Schweitzer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Audiologic monitoring for ototoxicity.

Authors:  K C Campbell; J Durrant
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Difluoromethylornithine plus sulindac for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens; Christine E McLaren; Daniel Pelot; Sharon Fujikawa-Brooks; Philip M Carpenter; Ernest Hawk; Gary Kelloff; Michael J Lawson; Jayashri Kidao; John McCracken; C Gregory Albers; Dennis J Ahnen; D Kim Turgeon; Steven Goldschmid; Peter Lance; Curt H Hagedorn; Daniel L Gillen; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-06

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  17 in total

1.  Biomarkers in exploring the frontiers of diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Patrick Yachimski; Richard M Peek
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  DFMO: targeted risk reduction therapy for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Christina M Laukaitis; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 3.  Recent advances in the development of polyamine analogues as antitumor agents.

Authors:  Robert A Casero; Patrick M Woster
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Impact of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acetaminophen on sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meghann E Kyle; James C Wang; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 5.  Primary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Targeting ornithine decarboxylase for the prevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer in humans.

Authors:  Craig A Elmets; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-01

Review 7.  Combination chemoprevention for colon cancer targeting polyamine synthesis and inflammation.

Authors:  Eugene W Gerner; Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Polyamines as mediators of APC-dependent intestinal carcinogenesis and cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Nathaniel S Rial; Frank L Meyskens; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 9.  Assessing toxicity in cancer chemoprevention trials: the other side of the coin.

Authors:  Gary E Goodman
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Functions of Polyamines in Mammals.

Authors:  Anthony E Pegg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.