Literature DB >> 9744507

What is the effect of adjusting epirubicin doses for body surface area?

N A Dobbs1, C J Twelves.   

Abstract

Doses of cytotoxic drugs are routinely adjusted according to body surface area. We have evaluated this practice in 32 women with advanced breast cancer treated with single-agent epirubicin 12.5-120 mg m(-2). Epirubicin and its metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Unadjusted plasma clearance was calculated from dose in mg, and adjusted clearance from dose in mg m(-2). Unadjusted clearance did not correlate with surface area, height, weight, per cent ideal body weight or body mass index. There was no difference in the coefficient of variation (CV) of adjusted and unadjusted clearance (39.4% and 37.7% respectively). The AUC that would have resulted from giving an unadjusted dose was calculated. This predicted AUC was accurate, unbiased and had the same CV as the actual AUC. Similarly, in 11 patients an analysis of actual and predicted neutropenia confirmed that unadjusted dosing would have had no significant effect on the pattern of myelosuppression. Normalization of epirubicin dosage according to surface area appears not to reduce either pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744507      PMCID: PMC2063057          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  10 in total

1.  Is dose normalization to weight or body surface area useful in adults?

Authors:  L B Grochow; C Baraldi; D Noe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Is body composition an important variable in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs? A review and suggestions for further research.

Authors:  J J Reilly; P Workman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Lean body mass, body surface area and epirubicin kinetics.

Authors:  W C Cosolo; D J Morgan; E Seeman; A S Zimet; J J McKendrick; J R Zalcberg
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  Age dependence of the early-phase pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin.

Authors:  J Robert; B Hoerni
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin: a population analysis.

Authors:  J R Wade; A W Kelman; D J Kerr; J Robert; B Whiting
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 4'-iodo-4'-deoxy-doxorubicin in humans.

Authors:  J Robert; J P Armand; S Huet; M Klink-Alakl; G Recondo; P Hurteloup
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of long-term continuous-infusion doxorubicin.

Authors:  S P Ackland; M J Ratain; N J Vogelzang; K E Choi; M Ruane; J A Sinkule
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Gender affects doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in patients with normal liver biochemistry.

Authors:  N A Dobbs; C J Twelves; H Gillies; C A James; P G Harper; R D Rubens
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of epirubicin: the importance of liver biochemistry tests.

Authors:  C J Twelves; N A Dobbs; Y Michael; L A Summers; W Gregory; P G Harper; R D Rubens; M A Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Iododoxorubicin in advanced breast cancer: a phase II evaluation of clinical activity, pharmacology and quality of life.

Authors:  C J Twelves; N A Dobbs; M A Lawrence; A J Ramirez; M Summerhayes; M A Richards; K E Towlson; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Epirubicin: a review of its efficacy as adjuvant therapy and in the treatment of metastatic disease in breast cancer.

Authors:  D Ormrod; K Holm; K Goa; C Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Factors affecting the pharmacokinetic profile of MS-275, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Milin R Acharya; Judith E Karp; Edward A Sausville; Kyunghwa Hwang; Qin Ryan; Ivana Gojo; Jurgen Venitz; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the anthracycline anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Romano Danesi; Stefano Fogli; Alessandra Gennari; Pierfranco Conte; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Impact of UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism on the outcome of adjuvant epirubicin treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sumit Parmar; Julia Carolin Stingl; Ariana Huber-Wechselberger; Alexander Kainz; Wilfried Renner; Uwe Langsenlehner; Peter Krippl; Jürgen Brockmöller; Elisabeth Haschke-Becher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  'The same old story': thoughts on authorized doses of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Fausto Meriggi; Alberto Zaniboni
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 8.168

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.