Literature DB >> 9685057

Effects of demographic variables on vorozole pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers and in breast cancer patients.

V K Piotrovsky1, M L Huang, A Van Peer, C Langenaecken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vorozole (VOR) is a selective nonsteroidal inhibitor of the cytochrome P450-dependent aromatase that catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens. It is currently being developed as a therapeutic agent in the endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. This work was aimed to explore the effects of demographic and other variables on VOR pharmacokinetics.
METHODS: VOR plasma concentration-time data were obtained in healthy volunteers and in breast cancer patients after the oral administration of 2.5 mg of VOR as a single dose or once daily. The data obtained in 6 formal pharmacokinetics (PK) studies with frequent plasma sampling were included in the data base (84 healthy male and female volunteers and 13 breast cancer patients). Also included were data from 2 clinical efficacy trials involving 286 breast cancer patients who were treated for several months (1 sample per visit, up to 14 samples/patient). The nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM) approach was applied. The two-compartment linear PK model with first-order absorption parameterized in terms of apparent clearance (CL), apparent central and peripheral volumes of distribution (Vc and Vp, respectively), apparent distributional flow (Q), and absorption constant (ka) was used. A population model was developed using data from formal PK studies. The final estimates of fixed and random effect parameters were obtained using both formal study data and clinical-efficacy trial data.
RESULTS: The typical CL value obtained after a single dose was lower in patients (4.8 l/h) as compared with healthy volunteers (8.6 l/h) and did not depend on gender. The multiple- to single-dose ratio was 0.76. CL was constant over ages of up to 50 years and then decreased slightly (0.047 l/h per year). The typical CL value did not depend on any demographic variable related to body size (total body weight, WT; body surface area; lean body mass). Q and Vc were proportional to WT (0.17 l h(-1) kg(-1) and 0.43 l/kg, respectively). Vp was also proportional to WT and was higher in women as compared with men (0.64 and 0.40 l/kg, respectively). The same was true for the apparent steady-state volume of distribution. No effect of race or the duration of therapy (0.5-28 months) was seen. The unexplained variability in CL and the residual variability in VOR plasma concentrations were 39% and 28% (coefficient of variation), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthy volunteer/patient, single/multiple dosing differences, and age were identified as the fixed effects influencing the CL of VOR. WT was the main determinant of distributional PK parameters. The peripheral and steady-state volumes of distribution were gender-dependent. In view of the relatively high degree of residual interpatient variability in CL, the slight effect of age on it is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9685057     DOI: 10.1007/s002800050808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  4 in total

Review 1.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Patrick Dufour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Proteomics of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A quantitative focus on drug elimination and pharmacodynamics effects.

Authors:  Areti-Maria Vasilogianni; Zubida M Al-Majdoub; Brahim Achour; Sheila Annie Peters; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Jill Barber
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.716

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.