Literature DB >> 20544315

Do ion levels in hip resurfacing differ from metal-on-metal THA at midterm?

A Moroni1, L Savarino, M Hoque, M Cadossi, N Baldini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing (MOM-BHR) is an alternative to metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MOM-THA), especially for young and/or active patients. However, wear resulting in increased serum ion levels is a concern. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) serum chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), and molybdenum (Mo) concentrations would differ between patients with either MOM-BHR or MOM-THA at 5 years, (2) confounding factors such as gender would influence ion levels; and (3) ion levels would differ at 2 and 5 years for each implant type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ions were measured in two groups with either MOM-BHR (n = 20) or MOM-THA (n = 35) and a mean 5-year followup, and two groups with either MOM-BHR (n = 15) or MOM-THA (n = 25) and a mean 2-year followup. Forty-eight healthy blood donors were recruited for reference values.
RESULTS: At 5 years, there were no differences in ion levels between patients with MOM-BHR or MOM-THA. Gender was a confounding factor, and in the MOM-BHR group at 5 years, Cr concentrations were greater in females compared with those of males. Mean ion levels were similar in patients with 2 and 5 years of followup for each implant type. Ion levels in patients were sevenfold to 10-fold higher than in controls.
CONCLUSIONS: As the metal ion concentrations in the serum at 5 years were in the range reported in the literature, we do not believe concerns regarding excessive metal ion levels after MOM-BHR are justified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20544315      PMCID: PMC3008887          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1424-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.

Authors:  S L Smith; D Dowson; A A Goldsmith
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Increased blood cobalt and chromium after total hip replacement.

Authors:  A W Schaffer; A Pilger; C Engelhardt; K Zweymueller; H W Ruediger
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  1999

3.  Can a safe level for metal ions in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties be determined?

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Diane L Back; D A Young; A J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Importance of head diameter, clearance, and cup wall thickness in elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Zhongmin Jin; P Roberts; P Grigoris
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  Sister chromatid exchanges and ion release in patients wearing fracture fixation devices.

Authors:  L Savarino; S Stea; D Granchi; M Visentin; G Ciapetti; M E Donati; G Rollo; G Zinghi; A Pizzoferrato; L Montanaro; A Toni
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-04

Review 7.  Understanding the role of corrosion in the degradation of metal-on-metal implants.

Authors:  Y Yan; A Neville; D Dowson
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 8.  Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip.

Authors:  P-A Vendittoli; S Mottard; A G Roy; C Dupont; M Lavigne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

9.  Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Ryan M Nunley; Stephen J Raterman; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Antonio Moroni; Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  Changes in serum chromium levels over 12 years after Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Maezawa; Masahiko Nozawa; Takahito Yuasa; Munehiko Sugimoto; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28

2.  Acetabular component thickness does not affect mid-term clinical results in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Mariam Al-Hamad; Michel J Le Duff; Karren M Takamura; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Case report: High chromium and cobalt levels in a pregnant patient with bilateral metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Juliane Fritzsche; Cornelia Borisch; Christof Schaefer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?

Authors:  Gabrielle S Donahue; Viktor Lindgren; Vincent P Galea; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?

Authors:  Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Eugenio Chiarello; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Contact patch to rim distance predicts metal ion levels in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  James P Yoon; Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Karren M Takamura; Edward Ebramzadeh; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Metal ion levels in large-diameter total hip and resurfacing hip arthroplasty--preliminary results of a prospective five year study after two years of follow-up.

Authors:  W Maurer-Ertl; J Friesenbichler; P Sadoghi; M Pechmann; M Trennheuser; A Leithner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  José M H Smolders; Annemiek Hol; Willard J Rijnberg; Job L C van Susante
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Chromium and cobalt ion concentrations in blood and serum following various types of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a literature overview.

Authors:  Christopher Jantzen; Henrik L Jørgensen; Benn R Duus; Sune L Sporring; Jes B Lauritzen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.