Literature DB >> 11217877

Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2: 3D modelling method.

J S Kim1, T S Park, S B Park, J S Kim1, I Y Kim, S I Kim.   

Abstract

Femoral neck anteversion is the torsion of the femoral head with reference to the distal femur. Conventional methods that use cross-sectional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance or ultrasound images to estimate femoral anteversion have met with several problems owing to the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the femur. A 3D imaging method has been developed that virtually measures femoral anteversion on the 3D computer space with continuous CT slices; this 3D method provides more accurate and reliable results than conventional 2D CT measurements. A 3D modelling method is devised for the measurement of femoral neck anteversion. This method has advantages over the 3D imaging method, such as shorter processing time, reduced number of slices and an objective result compared with the 3D imaging method. The results of the 3D modelling method are compared with the conventional CT methods (2D CT method and 3D imaging method) using 20 dried femurs.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11217877     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  14 in total

1.  A new method for determination of torsion of the femur.

Authors:  K DUNLAP; A R SHANDS; L C HOLLISTER; J S GAUL; H A STREIT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Ultrasound measurement of femoral anteversion.

Authors:  T Terjesen; S Anda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-07

3.  The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; M S Cohen; B A Shaw; J R Kasser; P P Griffin; R H Wilkinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Femoral anteversion.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S R Simon; P K Kijewski; R H Wilkinson; N T Griscom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Anteversion of the femoral neck.

Authors:  L Ruby; M A Mital; J O'Connor; U Patel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Femoral anteversion measured by the Dunlap/Rippstein and Norman methods.

Authors:  O Reikerås; A Høiseth; A Reigstad
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1985 May-Jun

7.  Practical considerations in the use of computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion.

Authors:  D S Weiner; A J Cook
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1980-04

8.  Measurements of cortical thickness in experimentally created endosteal bone lesions: a comparison of radiography, CT, MR imaging, and anatomic sections.

Authors:  K W Preidler; J Brossmann; B Daenen; R Pedowitz; M De Maeseneer; D Trudell; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method.

Authors:  J S Kim; T S Park; S B Park; J S Kim; I Y Kim; S I Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Normal and abnormal torsional development in children.

Authors:  G Fabry; L X Cheng; G Molenaers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

1.  Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kwan Kyu Park; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Dimitris Dimitriou; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Lee; Seung Hoon Oh; Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Taek Rim Yoon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Predicting anatomical landmarks and bone morphology of the femur using local region matching.

Authors:  Cong-Bo Phan; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  A three-dimensional axis for the study of femoral neck orientation.

Authors:  Noémie Bonneau; Paul-Antoine Libourel; Caroline Simonis; Laurent Puymerail; Michel Baylac; Christine Tardieu; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Reliability and concurrent validity of angle measurements in lower limb: EOS 3D goniometer versus 2D manual goniometer.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Fanli Tian; Zhigang Zhang; Weidong Shi; Jun Lin; Liang Chen; Huilin Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Greater trochanter location measurement using a three-dimensional motion capture system during prone hip extension.

Authors:  Ji-Su Yu; Jae-Seop Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-02-24

Review 7.  Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement.

Authors:  Matteo Scorcelletti; Neil D Reeves; Jörn Rittweger; Alex Ireland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  A robust method for automatic identification of femoral landmarks, axes, planes and bone coordinate systems using surface models.

Authors:  Maximilian C M Fischer; Sonja A G A Grothues; Juliana Habor; Matías de la Fuente; Klaus Radermacher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Morphometric Evaluation of Korean Femurs by Geometric Computation: Comparisons of the Sex and the Population.

Authors:  Ho-Jung Cho; Dai-Soon Kwak; In-Beom Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Magnetic Resonance Three-dimensional Cube Technique in the Measurement of Piglet Femoral Anteversion.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Sun; Shi-Nong Pan; En-Bo Wang; Li-Qiang Zheng; Wen-Li Guo; Xi-Hu Fu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.