Literature DB >> 26611727

Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

Kwan Kyu Park1,2, Tsung-Yuan Tsai1, Dimitris Dimitriou1, Young-Min Kwon3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The potential influence of acetabular component orientation on iliopsoas impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been previously quantified. The aim of the present study was to utilize pre- and post-operative CT-based 3D models to quantify iliopsoas impingement on acetabular components, and to identify any potential factors associated with iliopsoas impingement.
METHODS: Iliopsoas muscle was modelled from pre-operative CT scans and transferred to the post-operative 3D models in 19 THAs. The volume and the area of the overlap between iliopsoas muscle and acetabular cup (iliopsoas volume & area) was measured on axial and sagittal images. Most protruded lengths of cup uncovered by acetabular bone were measured on axial sagittal scan of CT scans. Version of acetabulum, acetabular cup, and the difference between the two (version difference) were also measured with cup inclination and size. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify any factor influencing iliopsoas impingement.
RESULTS: Iliopsoas impingement volume and area were 100.6 ± 226.1 (range, 0.0-663.9) mm³ and 52.6 ± 102.0 (0.0-342.3) mm³, respectively. The protruded lengths on axial and sagittal view were 6.9 ± 5.3 (0.0-16.0) and 2.1 ± 2.7 (0.0-8.0). Linear regression model showed that version difference was significantly related to the iliopsoas impingement volume and area (beta = -0.709, p = 0.041 for volume, and beta = -0.684, p = 0.047 for area).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that iliopsoas impingement on acetabular components was influenced by the version difference between pre-operative acetabular bone and acetabular component rather than the magnitude of post-operative cup version alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iliopsoas impingement; In-vivo 3-dimensional study; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611727     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Iliopsoas impingement on the acetabular component: radiologic and computed tomography findings of a rare hip prosthesis complication in eight cases.

Authors:  Catherine Cyteval; M Pierre Sarrabère; Alain Cottin; Chahine Assi; Leila Morcos; Philippe Maury; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Ultrasound diagnosis of anterior iliopsoas impingement in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ridha Rezig; Michele Copercini; Xavier Montet; Carlo Martinoli; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Giant iliopsoas bursitis: sonographic findings with magnetic resonance correlations.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi; Carlo Martinoli; Alain Keller; Maria Pia Bianchi-Zamorani
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  Sonographically guided injection of anesthetic for iliopsoas tendinopathy after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ross Wank; Theodore T Miller; Jeffrey F Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Evaluation of patients with pain following total hip replacement.

Authors:  Patrick J Duffy; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Maximilian R Volkmann; Maximilian Koppmair; Lars Rackwitz; Martin Lüdemann; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A novel dual fluoroscopic imaging method for determination of THA kinematics: in-vitro and in-vivo study.

Authors:  Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Jing-Sheng Li; Shaobai Wang; Hao Lin; Henrik Malchau; Guoan Li; Harry Rubash; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Bryan J Nestor; Carolyn M Sofka; Stephanie T Ho; Lance E Peters; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  9 in total

1.  Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Florian Voellner; Michael Worlicek; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benedikt Messmer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  New combined anteversion technique in hybrid THA: cup-first procedure with CT-based navigation.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Masumoto; Shigeo Fukunishi; Tomokazu Fukui; Shinichi Yoshiya; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Taishi Okada; Makoto Kanto; Ariha Goshi; Futoshi Morio; Yu Takeda
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-08

4.  Measurement of operative femoral anteversion during cementless total hip arthroplasty and influencing factors for using neck-adjustable femoral stem.

Authors:  Jingyang Sun; Bohan Zhang; Lei Geng; Qingyuan Zheng; Juncheng Li; Wenzhe Cao; Ming Ni; Guoqiang Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georgios Tsikandylakis; Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Antti Eskelinen; Johan Kärrholm; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

6.  Arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty with acetabular cup malposition: Two case reports.

Authors:  Heejae Won; Kwang-Hwan Kim; Jae-Wook Jung; Shin-Yoon Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Optimizing the Femoral Offset for Restoring Physiological Hip Muscle Function in Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiangjun Hu; Nan Zheng; Yunsu Chen; Kerong Dai; Dimitris Dimitriou; Huiwu Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-30

8.  Risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty using a collared femoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Jiandi Qiu; Xiurong Ke; Shanxi Chen; Liben Zhao; Fanghui Wu; Guojing Yang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Adverse effects of total hip arthroplasty on the hip abductor and adductor muscle lengths and moment arms during gait.

Authors:  Xiangjun Hu; Nan Zheng; Wei-Chun Hsu; Jingwei Zhang; Huiwu Li; Yunsu Chen; Kerong Dai; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.