Literature DB >> 9168714

Measurements of cortical thickness in experimentally created endosteal bone lesions: a comparison of radiography, CT, MR imaging, and anatomic sections.

K W Preidler1, J Brossmann, B Daenen, R Pedowitz, M De Maeseneer, D Trudell, D Resnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cortical measurements of experimentally created endosteal cortical lesions and to assess the sensitivity of radiography, CT, and MR imaging in the detection and measurement of such lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six cortical lesions were created in three fresh cadaveric femurs. After performing radiography, CT, and MR imaging, we sectioned the specimens in the axial plane. We then measured the remaining cortex at the lesions and the normal cortex adjacent to the lesions on all images and corresponding anatomic sections. The measurements of thickness of the cortex as seen with the different imaging methods and the anatomic sections were compared. Measurements were repeated to evaluate the influence of different window settings on the MR imaging measurements.
RESULTS: When measured on radiographs, cortical thickness was overestimated in 58% of lesions. With CT, cortical thickness was overestimated by 0-15% in 94% of all lesions. With MR imaging, cortical thickness was uniformly underestimated by 3-17%. Measurements made on MR images varied according to different window settings. The proton density-weighted sequence yielded the highest sensitivity in the detection of shallow cortical lesions; the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence was the least sensitive of the MR sequences.
CONCLUSION: In our cadaveric study, cortical thickness in the presence of endosteal lesions was overestimated on radiographs and CT scans and underestimated on MR images. Measurements derived from MR imaging are strongly influenced by the window setting. MR imaging with the proton density-weighted sequence is the most sensitive for detection of shallow cortical lesions and is more sensitive than CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9168714     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 2: 3D modelling method.

Authors:  J S Kim; T S Park; S B Park; J S Kim; I Y Kim; S I Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of radiographic scoring systems for assessment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Paul S Babyn; Brian Feldman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-03-22

3.  X-Ray-Induced Acoustic Computed Tomography (XACT): Initial Experiment on Bone Sample.

Authors:  Elijah Robertson; Pratik Samant; Siqi Wang; Tiffany Tran; Xuanrong Ji; Liangzhong Xiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Radiological and histopathological assessment of bone infiltration in soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Luis Rodrigo Merino-Rueda; Irene Barrientos-Ruiz; Daniel Bernabeu-Taboada; José J Pozo-Kreilinger; Manuel Peleteiro-Pensado; José M Cordero-García; Eduardo J Ortiz-Cruz
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Garrett V Christensen; Hiroaki Ishikawa; Heath B Henninger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Megan Mills; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.