Literature DB >> 25673075

Predicting anatomical landmarks and bone morphology of the femur using local region matching.

Cong-Bo Phan1, Seungbum Koo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anatomical landmarks and bony features are frequently used in biomechanical and surgical applications. The purpose of this study was to develop a local region matching-based anatomical landmark prediction method.
METHODS: A reference femur model with anatomical landmarks and a surface division map was prepared. Initial registration between the reference femur model and a target femur model was performed in three-dimensional Cartesian space, and closest point pairs were determined by the initial surface correspondence. The models were mapped to unit spheres through spherical parameterization. Spherical registration using the closest point pairs in the spherical parametric space enabled the application of a division map from the reference model to the target model. The reference and target models were divided into local regions defined in the division map, and the corresponding regions were again registered in Cartesian space. Anatomical landmarks in the local regions were identified in the target model.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the proposed method was tested for anatomical landmarks marked by a clinician on 35 femoral models. The effectiveness of local region matching was demonstrated by automatic measurements of the femoral neck-shaft angle. The average prediction error for all eight anatomical landmarks of the femur was 2.74 (±1.78) mm. The average of the predicted neck-shaft angle for our Korean subjects was 126.41° (±4.92°), which was comparable to previous studies in Japanese and Chinese populations.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical landmarks and features could be accurately predicted using the proposed local region matching method. This method offers robustness and accuracy in determining anatomical bony landmarks and bone morphology for clinical and biomechanical applications.

Keywords:  Anatomical features; Anatomical landmarks; Local region matching; Morphological measurement; Registration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673075     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1155-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  30 in total

1.  Morphological study of the proximal femur: a new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering.

Authors:  Banchong Mahaisavariya; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip; Trongtum Tongdee; Erik L J Bohez; Jos Vander Sloten; Philip Oris
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

3.  Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment.

Authors:  W P Yau; Anthony Leung; K Y Chiu; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Comparison of laser surface scanning and fiducial marker-based registration in frameless stereotaxy. Technical note.

Authors:  Kurt Schicho; Michael Figl; Rudolf Seemann; Markus Donat; Michael L Pretterklieber; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Astrid Reichwein; Felix Wanschitz; Franz Kainberger; Helmar Bergmann; Arne Wagner; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W P Yau; Anthony Leung; K G Liu; C H Yan; Lisa L S Wong; K Y Chiu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.

Authors:  N Sugano; P C Noble; E Kamaric
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  A multi-resolution scheme for distortion-minimizing mapping between human subcortical structures based on geodesic construction on Riemannian manifolds.

Authors:  Youngsang Cho; Joon-Kyung Seong; Sung Yong Shin; Yong Jeong; Jong Hun Kim; Anqi Qiu; Kiho Im; Jong Min Lee; Duk L Na
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.

Authors:  O Husmann; P J Rubin; P F Leyvraz; B de Roguin; J N Argenson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck.

Authors:  B Isaac; S Vettivel; R Prasad; L Jeyaseelan; G Chandi
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.414

10.  Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side.

Authors:  Ian Gilligan; Supichya Chandraphak; Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  3 in total

1.  Atlas-based algorithm for automatic anatomical measurements in the knee.

Authors:  Michael Brehler; Gaurav Thawait; Jonathan Kaplan; John Ramsay; Miho J Tanaka; Shadpour Demehri; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-19

2.  A robust method for automatic identification of femoral landmarks, axes, planes and bone coordinate systems using surface models.

Authors:  Maximilian C M Fischer; Sonja A G A Grothues; Juliana Habor; Matías de la Fuente; Klaus Radermacher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Relative movement on the articular surfaces of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints during walking.

Authors:  C-B Phan; D-P Nguyen; K M Lee; S Koo
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.