Cong-Bo Phan1, Seungbum Koo2. 1. Biomechanics Lab, School of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseokro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-756, Republic of Korea. 2. Biomechanics Lab, School of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseokro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-756, Republic of Korea. skoo@cau.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anatomical landmarks and bony features are frequently used in biomechanical and surgical applications. The purpose of this study was to develop a local region matching-based anatomical landmark prediction method. METHODS: A reference femur model with anatomical landmarks and a surface division map was prepared. Initial registration between the reference femur model and a target femur model was performed in three-dimensional Cartesian space, and closest point pairs were determined by the initial surface correspondence. The models were mapped to unit spheres through spherical parameterization. Spherical registration using the closest point pairs in the spherical parametric space enabled the application of a division map from the reference model to the target model. The reference and target models were divided into local regions defined in the division map, and the corresponding regions were again registered in Cartesian space. Anatomical landmarks in the local regions were identified in the target model. RESULTS: The accuracy of the proposed method was tested for anatomical landmarks marked by a clinician on 35 femoral models. The effectiveness of local region matching was demonstrated by automatic measurements of the femoral neck-shaft angle. The average prediction error for all eight anatomical landmarks of the femur was 2.74 (±1.78) mm. The average of the predicted neck-shaft angle for our Korean subjects was 126.41° (±4.92°), which was comparable to previous studies in Japanese and Chinese populations. CONCLUSION: Anatomical landmarks and features could be accurately predicted using the proposed local region matching method. This method offers robustness and accuracy in determining anatomical bony landmarks and bone morphology for clinical and biomechanical applications.
PURPOSE: Anatomical landmarks and bony features are frequently used in biomechanical and surgical applications. The purpose of this study was to develop a local region matching-based anatomical landmark prediction method. METHODS: A reference femur model with anatomical landmarks and a surface division map was prepared. Initial registration between the reference femur model and a target femur model was performed in three-dimensional Cartesian space, and closest point pairs were determined by the initial surface correspondence. The models were mapped to unit spheres through spherical parameterization. Spherical registration using the closest point pairs in the spherical parametric space enabled the application of a division map from the reference model to the target model. The reference and target models were divided into local regions defined in the division map, and the corresponding regions were again registered in Cartesian space. Anatomical landmarks in the local regions were identified in the target model. RESULTS: The accuracy of the proposed method was tested for anatomical landmarks marked by a clinician on 35 femoral models. The effectiveness of local region matching was demonstrated by automatic measurements of the femoral neck-shaft angle. The average prediction error for all eight anatomical landmarks of the femur was 2.74 (±1.78) mm. The average of the predicted neck-shaft angle for our Korean subjects was 126.41° (±4.92°), which was comparable to previous studies in Japanese and Chinese populations. CONCLUSION: Anatomical landmarks and features could be accurately predicted using the proposed local region matching method. This method offers robustness and accuracy in determining anatomical bony landmarks and bone morphology for clinical and biomechanical applications.
Keywords:
Anatomical features; Anatomical landmarks; Local region matching; Morphological measurement; Registration
Authors: Banchong Mahaisavariya; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip; Trongtum Tongdee; Erik L J Bohez; Jos Vander Sloten; Philip Oris Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Kurt Schicho; Michael Figl; Rudolf Seemann; Markus Donat; Michael L Pretterklieber; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Astrid Reichwein; Felix Wanschitz; Franz Kainberger; Helmar Bergmann; Arne Wagner; Rolf Ewers Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Youngsang Cho; Joon-Kyung Seong; Sung Yong Shin; Yong Jeong; Jong Hun Kim; Anqi Qiu; Kiho Im; Jong Min Lee; Duk L Na Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-05-30 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael Brehler; Gaurav Thawait; Jonathan Kaplan; John Ramsay; Miho J Tanaka; Shadpour Demehri; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-06-19
Authors: Maximilian C M Fischer; Sonja A G A Grothues; Juliana Habor; Matías de la Fuente; Klaus Radermacher Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 4.379