Literature DB >> 10610141

Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR.

J F Doreleijers1, M L Raves, T Rullmann, R Kaptein.   

Abstract

The completeness of experimentally observed NOE restraints of a set of 97 NMR protein structures deposited in the PDB has been assessed. Completeness is defined as the ratio of the number of experimentally observed NOEs and the number of 'expected NOEs'. A practical definition of 'expected NOEs' based on inter-proton distances in the structures up to a given cut-off distance is proposed. The average completeness for the set of 97 structures is 68, 48, and 26% up to 3, 4, and 5 A cut-off distances, respectively. For recent state-of-the-art structures these numbers are approximately 90, 75, and 45%. Almost 20% of the observed NOEs are between atoms that are further than 5 A apart in the final structures. The completeness is independent of the relative surface accessibility and does not depend strongly on residue type, secondary structure or local precision, although the number of observed NOEs in these classes varies considerably. The completeness of NOE restraints is a useful quality criterion in the course of structure refinement. The completeness per residue is more informative than the number of NOEs per residue, which makes it a useful tool to assess the quality of the NMR data set in relation to the resulting structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10610141     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008335423527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  26 in total

1.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

2.  Model building and refinement practice.

Authors:  G J Kleywegt; T A Jones
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. IUPAC-IUBMB-IUPAB Inter-Union Task Group on the Standardization of Data Bases of Protein and Nucleic Acid Structures Determined by NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  J L Markley; A Bax; Y Arata; C W Hilbers; R Kaptein; B D Sykes; P E Wright; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Floating stereospecific assignment revisited: application to an 18 kDa protein and comparison with J-coupling data.

Authors:  R H Folmer; C W Hilbers; R N Konings; M Nilges
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Phi/psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited.

Authors:  G J Kleywegt; T A Jones
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches.

Authors:  D A Pearlman
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Protein structures in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry. The polypeptide fold of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor determined using two different algorithms, DISGEO and DISMAN.

Authors:  G Wagner; W Braun; T F Havel; T Schaumann; N Go; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The impact of direct refinement against three-bond HN-C alpha H coupling constants on protein structure determination by NMR.

Authors:  D S Garrett; J Kuszewski; T J Hancock; P J Lodi; G W Vuister; A M Gronenborn; G M Clore
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-05

9.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K Wüthrich; M Billeter; W Braun
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Stereospecific nuclear magnetic resonance assignments of the methyl groups of valine and leucine in the DNA-binding domain of the 434 repressor by biosynthetically directed fractional 13C labeling.

Authors:  D Neri; T Szyperski; G Otting; H Senn; K Wüthrich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  28 in total

1.  De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

Authors:  P M Bowers; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Joint refinement as a tool for thorough comparison between NMR and X-ray data and structures of HU protein.

Authors:  M L Raves; J F Doreleijer; H Vis; C E Vorgias; K S Wilson; R Kaptei
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Principal components analysis of protein structure ensembles calculated using NMR data.

Authors:  P W Howe
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christian A E M Spronk; Jens P Linge; Cornelis W Hilbers; Geerten W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  BioMagResBank database with sets of experimental NMR constraints corresponding to the structures of over 1400 biomolecules deposited in the Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  Jurgen F Doreleijers; Steve Mading; Dimitri Maziuk; Kassandra Sojourner; Lei Yin; Jun Zhu; John L Markley; Eldon L Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Computational design and experimental verification of a symmetric protein homodimer.

Authors:  Yun Mou; Po-Ssu Huang; Fang-Ciao Hsu; Shing-Jong Huang; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  NMR structure determination of proteins supplemented by quantum chemical calculations: detailed structure of the Ca2+ sites in the EGF34 fragment of protein S.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Hsiao; Torbjörn Drakenberg; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Definition of a new information-based per-residue quality parameter.

Authors:  Sander B Nabuurs; Elmar Krieger; Chris A E M Spronk; Aart J Nederveen; Gert Vriend; Geerten W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  BioMagResBank databases DOCR and FRED containing converted and filtered sets of experimental NMR restraints and coordinates from over 500 protein PDB structures.

Authors:  Jurgen F Doreleijers; Aart J Nederveen; Wim Vranken; Jundong Lin; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Robert Kaptein; John L Markley; Eldon L Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Contact replacement for NMR resonance assignment.

Authors:  Fei Xiong; Gopal Pandurangan; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.