Literature DB >> 6733884

Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.

R E Kerber, C Kouba, J Martins, K Kelly, R Low, R Hoyt, D Ferguson, L Bailey, P Bennett, F Charbonnier.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to evaluate a method that predicts transthoracic impedance in advance of defibrillating shocks in humans and to assess the importance of transthoracic impedance in low-energy defibrillation. Via defibrillator electrodes we applied 31 kHz current to the chest during the defibrillator charge cycle, before the defibrillating shock was actually delivered. The current flow was limited by transthoracic impedance; a microprocessor monitored the predischarge current flow and determined the predischarge impedance by calibration against known resistance values. Actual impedance to the defibrillating shock was also determined and compared with the predicted impedance. With this approach we predicted impedance in 19 patients who received 66 shocks for ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. Predicted impedance (y) correlated very well with actual impedance (x):y = .90x + 11.3; r = .97. To determine the importance of impedance in defibrillation and cardioversion, we prospectively gathered data from 96 patients who received shocks of various energies for ventricular or atrial arrhythmias. In patients with high transthoracic impedance (greater than 97 omega), low-energy shocks (less than or equal to 100 J) for ventricular defibrillation had only a 20% success rate as opposed to a 70% success rate for low-energy shocks in patients with low or average impedance (p less than .05). We conclude that transthoracic impedance can be accurately predicted in advance of defibrillation and cardioversion. This method permits the preshock identification of patients with high impedance in whom attempts to defibrillate with low-energy shocks are inappropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6733884     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Electrode impedance: an indicator of electrode-tissue contact and lesion dimensions during linear ablation.

Authors:  X Zheng; G P Walcott; J A Hall; D L Rollins; W M Smith; G N Kay; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support. Advanced Life Support Working Group of the European Resuscitation Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

3.  Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  G W Dalzell; A A Adgey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-06

4.  Randomised comparison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  T P Mathew; A Moore; M McIntyre; M T Harbinson; N P Campbell; A A Adgey; G W Dalzell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Role of peak current in conversion of patients with ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Paul Weng Wan; Seow Yian Tay; Peter George Manning; Swee Han Lim; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Tiru Mohan; Antony Charles Rabind; Sudarshan Vidya; Ying Hao
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

Authors:  B B Lerman; H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; K Brin; C W Clark; O C Deale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Elevated impedance during cardioversion in neonates with atrial flutter.

Authors:  Scott R Ceresnak; Thomas J Starc; Allan J Hordof; Robert H Pass; William J Bonney; Leonardo Liberman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Test of four defibrillation dosing strategies using a two-dimensional finite-element model.

Authors:  J L Lehr; I F Ramirez; W J Karlon; S R Eisenberg
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 9.  How good is your defibrillation technique?

Authors:  Daniel M Sado; Charles D Deakin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Orthogonal electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation refractory to biphasic shocks: a case series.

Authors:  Enrique Velázquez-Rodríguez; Hipólito Alfredo Pérez-Sandoval; Francisco Javier Rangel-Rojo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.