Literature DB >> 11139586

Synchronized domain-opening motion of GroEL is essential for communication between the two rings.

K Shiseki1, N Murai, F Motojima, T Hisabori, M Yoshida, H Taguchi.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL consists of two stacked rings of seven identical subunits each. Accompanying binding of ATP and GroES to one ring of GroEL, that ring undergoes a large en bloc domain movement, in which the apical domain twists upward and outward. A mutant GroEL(AEX) (C138S,C458S,C519S,D83C,K327C) in the oxidized form is locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain disulfide cross-link and cannot hydrolyze ATP (Murai, N., Makino, Y., and Yoshida, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28229-28234). By reconstitution of GroEL complex from subunits of both wild-type GroEL and oxidized GroEL(AEX), hybrid GroEL complexes containing various numbers of oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunits were prepared. ATPase activity of the hybrid GroEL containing one or two oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunits per ring was about 70% higher than that of wild-type GroEL. Based on the detailed analysis of the ATPase activity, we concluded that inter-ring negative cooperativity was lost in the hybrid GroEL, indicating that synchronized opening of the subunits in one ring is necessary for the negative cooperativity. Indeed, hybrid GroEL complex reconstituted from subunits of wild-type and GroEL mutant (D398A), which is ATPase-deficient but can undergo domain opening motion, retained the negative cooperativity of ATPase. In contrast, the ability of GroEL to assist protein folding was impaired by the presence of a single oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunit in a ring. Taken together, cooperative conformational transitions in GroEL rings ensure the functional communication between the two rings of GroEL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139586     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M010348200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  8 in total

1.  Denaturation and reassembly of chaperonin GroEL studied by solution X-ray scattering.

Authors:  Munehito Arai; Tomonao Inobe; Kosuke Maki; Teikichi Ikura; Hiroshi Kihara; Yoshiyuki Amemiya; Kunihiro Kuwajima
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155 -> Ala.

Authors:  Oded Danziger; Dalia Rivenzon-Segal; Sharon G Wolf; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: a time-resolved infrared difference study.

Authors:  Begoña Sot; Fritzthof von Germar; Werner Mäntele; Jose María Valpuesta; Stefka G Taneva; Arturo Muga
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL.

Authors:  Masatoshi Yokokawa; Chieko Wada; Toshio Ando; Nobuaki Sakai; Akira Yagi; Shige H Yoshimura; Kunio Takeyasu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Concerted ATP-induced allosteric transitions in GroEL facilitate release of protein substrate domains in an all-or-none manner.

Authors:  Yakov Kipnis; Niv Papo; Gilad Haran; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Design of an optical switch for studying conformational dynamics in individual molecules of GroEL.

Authors:  Gabriel A Frank; Yakov Kipnis; Elena Smolensky; Shirley S Daube; Amnon Horovitz; Gilad Haran
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.774

7.  Concerted release of substrate domains from GroEL by ATP is demonstrated with FRET.

Authors:  Niv Papo; Yakov Kipnis; Gilad Haran; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Allosteric differences dictate GroEL complementation of E. coli.

Authors:  Jared Sivinski; Duc Ngo; Christopher J Zerio; Andrew J Ambrose; Edmond R Watson; Lynn K Kaneko; Marius M Kostelic; Mckayla Stevens; Anne-Marie Ray; Yangshin Park; Chunxiang Wu; Michael T Marty; Quyen Q Hoang; Donna D Zhang; Gabriel C Lander; Steven M Johnson; Eli Chapman
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.