Literature DB >> 35199390

Allosteric differences dictate GroEL complementation of E. coli.

Jared Sivinski1, Duc Ngo1, Christopher J Zerio1, Andrew J Ambrose1, Edmond R Watson2, Lynn K Kaneko1, Marius M Kostelic3, Mckayla Stevens4, Anne-Marie Ray4, Yangshin Park4,5,6, Chunxiang Wu7, Michael T Marty3, Quyen Q Hoang4,5,6, Donna D Zhang1, Gabriel C Lander2, Steven M Johnson4, Eli Chapman1.   

Abstract

GroES/GroEL is the only bacterial chaperone essential under all conditions, making it a potential antibiotic target. Rationally targeting ESKAPE GroES/GroEL as an antibiotic strategy necessitates studying their structure and function. Herein, we outline the structural similarities between Escherichia coli and ESKAPE GroES/GroEL and identify significant differences in intra- and inter-ring cooperativity, required in the refolding cycle of client polypeptides. Previously, we observed that one-half of ESKAPE GroES/GroEL family members could not support cell viability when each was individually expressed in GroES/GroEL-deficient E. coli cells. Cell viability was found to be dependent on the allosteric compatibility between ESKAPE and E. coli subunits within mixed (E. coli and ESKAPE) tetradecameric GroEL complexes. Interestingly, differences in allostery did not necessarily result in differences in refolding rate for a given homotetradecameric chaperonin. Characterization of ESKAPE GroEL allostery, ATPase, and refolding rates in this study will serve to inform future studies focused on inhibitor design and mechanism of action studies.
© 2022 Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESKAPE; GroEL; GroES; allostery; chaperone; chaperonin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35199390      PMCID: PMC8887798          DOI: 10.1096/fj.202101708RR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  74 in total

1.  Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES.

Authors:  Yael Fridmann; Galit Kafri; Oded Danziger; Amnon Horovitz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Eli Chapman; George W Farr; Renata Usaite; Krystyna Furtak; Wayne A Fenton; Tapan K Chaudhuri; Elise R Hondorp; Rowena G Matthews; Sharon G Wolf; John R Yates; Marc Pypaert; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES.

Authors:  Melissa Illingworth; Andrew Ramsey; Zhida Zheng; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.

Authors:  Han Liu; Eszter Kovács; Peter A Lund
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines.

Authors:  B Bukau; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL.

Authors:  R Zahn; A M Buckle; S Perrett; C M Johnson; F J Corrales; R Golbik; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Host participation in bacteriophage lambda head assembly.

Authors:  C P Georgopoulos; R W Hendrix; S R Casjens; A D Kaiser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1973-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31.

Authors:  A Richardson; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Eliminating Artifacts in Electrospray Deconvolution with a SoftMax Function.

Authors:  Michael T Marty
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 10.  Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens.

Authors:  Sirijan Santajit; Nitaya Indrawattana
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.