Literature DB >> 11139308

Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner.

S Sone1, F Li, Z G Yang, T Honda, Y Maruyama, S Takashima, M Hasegawa, S Kawakami, K Kubo, M Haniuda, T Yamanda.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of annual screening for lung cancer by low-dose computed tomography (CT) and the characteristics of identified lung cancers. Subjects consisted of 5483 general population aged 40-74 years, who received initial CT scans in 1996, followed by repeat annual scans for most subjects in 1997 and 1998, with a total of 13 786 scans taken during 1996-1998. Work-up examinations for patients with suspicious lesions were conducted using diagnostic CTs. The initial screening in 1996 detected suspicious nodules in 279 (5.1%) of 5483 subjects, and 22 (8%) were confirmed surgically to have lung cancer. Corresponding figures in 1997 and 1998 screening studies were 173 (3.9%) of 4425 and 25 (14%) of 173, and 136 (3.5%) of 3878 and 9 (7%) of 136, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting surgically confirmed lung cancer were 55% (22/40) and 95% (4960/5199) in 1996 and 83% (25/30) and 97% (4113/4252) in 1997 screening, respectively. 88% (55/60) of lung cancers identified on screening and surgically confirmed were AJCC stage IA. Our trial allowed detection of nearly 11 times the expected annual number of early lung cancers. Repeat CT allowed the detection of more aggressive, rapidly growing lung cancers, compared to those in the initial screening. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139308      PMCID: PMC2363609          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  12 in total

1.  Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer.

Authors:  C F Mountain
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo Lung Project revisited.

Authors:  B J Flehinger; M Kimmel; T Polyak; M R Melamed
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The economics of cancer prevention and detection: getting more for less.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical and prognostic assessment of patients with resected small peripheral lung cancer lesions.

Authors:  M Sagawa; Y Saito; S Takahashi; K Usuda; K Kamma; M Sato; S Ota; N Nagamoto; S Fujimura; T Nakada
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cancer statistics, 1998.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population based screening using spiral CT.

Authors:  S Sone; F Li; Z G Yang; S Takashima; Y Maruyama; M Hasegawa; J C Wang; S Kawakami; T Honda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.

Authors:  M Kaneko; K Eguchi; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; T Naruke; K Suemasu; N Moriyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Limitation of annual screening chest radiography for the diagnosis of lung cancer. A retrospective study.

Authors:  H Soda; H Tomita; S Kohno; M Oka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  S Sone; S Takashima; F Li; Z Yang; T Honda; Y Maruyama; M Hasegawa; T Yamanda; K Kubo; K Hanamura; K Asakura
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Long-term survival outcomes by smoking status in surgical and nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer: comparing never smokers and current smokers.

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Craig M Hooker; James Harris; Li Xu; William H Westra; J Timothy Sherwood; Marc Sussman; Stephen M Cattaneo; James Shin; Solange Cox; Joani Christensen; Yelena Prints; Nance Yuan; Jennifer Zhang; Stephen C Yang; Malcolm V Brock
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Resolving small pulmonary nodules: CT features.

Authors:  S Diederich; J Hansen; D Wormanns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Pulmonary nodule characterization: a comparison of conventional with quantitative and visual semi-quantitative analyses using contrast enhancement maps.

Authors:  Iva Petkovska; Sumit K Shah; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Jonathan G Goldin; Matthew S Brown; Hyun J Kim; Kathleen Brown; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward F Patz; Paul Pinsky; Constantine Gatsonis; Jorean D Sicks; Barnett S Kramer; Martin C Tammemägi; Caroline Chiles; William C Black; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  Unleashing the power of proteomics to develop blood-based cancer markers.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Computed tomography assessment of response to therapy: tumor volume change measurement, truth data, and error.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Marios A Gavrielides; Charles Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao; Anthony P Reeves; Reinhard Beichel; Hyun-Jung Grace Kim; Lisa Kinnard
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.