Literature DB >> 20446065

Lung cancer screening: an update, discussion, and look ahead.

Peter J Mazzone1.   

Abstract

Over the past few years there has been a great deal of debate about the status of lung cancer screening. The debate has focused on at least three areas: the unmet need to prove a mortality reduction from the screening tests being studied, the potential for these screening tests to produce harm, and the possible cost-effectiveness of an image-based screening program. In this manuscript, I review the chest imaging cohort and controlled trials that have been added to the evidence base over the past few years. I then discuss the evidence related to the areas that are currently debated, describe the ongoing trials that will help to clarify these issues, and speculate about the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20446065     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-010-0111-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  47 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  John K Gohagan; Pamela M Marcus; Richard M Fagerstrom; Paul F Pinsky; Barnett S Kramer; Philip C Prorok; Susan Ascher; William Bailey; Brenda Brewer; Timothy Church; Deborah Engelhard; Melissa Ford; Mona Fouad; Matthew Freedman; Edward Gelmann; David Gierada; William Hocking; Subbarao Inampudi; Brian Irons; Christine Cole Johnson; Arthur Jones; Gena Kucera; Paul Kvale; Karen Lappe; William Manor; Alisha Moore; Hrudaya Nath; Sarah Neff; Martin Oken; Michael Plunkett; Helen Price; Douglas Reding; Thomas Riley; Martin Schwartz; David Spizarny; Roberta Yoffie; Carl Zylak
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Overdiagnosis in chest radiographic screening for lung carcinoma: frequency.

Authors:  David F Yankelevitz; William J Kostis; Claudia I Henschke; Robert T Heelan; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  John Gohagan; Pamela Marcus; Richard Fagerstrom; Paul Pinsky; Barnett Kramer; Philip Prorok
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  3p microsatellite signature in exhaled breath condensate and tumor tissue of patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Giovanna E Carpagnano; Maria Pia Foschino-Barbaro; Antonio Spanevello; Onofrio Resta; Francesco Carpagnano; Giuseppina Mulé; Rosamaria Pinto; Stefania Tommasi; Angelo Paradiso
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan.

Authors:  David O Wilson; Joel L Weissfeld; Carl R Fuhrman; Stephen N Fisher; Paula Balogh; Rodney J Landreneau; James D Luketich; Jill M Siegfried
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Baseline results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR).

Authors:  Thierry Blanchon; Jeanne-Marie Bréchot; Philippe A Grenier; Gilbert R Ferretti; Etienne Lemarié; Bernard Milleron; Dominique Chagué; François Laurent; Yves Martinet; Catherine Beigelman-Aubry; François Blanchon; Marie-Pierre Revel; Sylvie Friard; Martine Rémy-Jardin; Manuela Vasile; Nicola Santelmo; Alain Lecalier; Patricia Lefébure; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Jean-Luc Breton; Marie-France Carette; Christian Brambilla; François Fournel; Alexia Kieffer; Guy Frija; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Canadian experience.

Authors:  Heidi C Roberts; Demetris Patsios; Narinder S Paul; Maureen McGregor; Gordon Weisbrod; Taebong Chung; Steven Herman; Scott Boerner; Thomas Waddell; Shafique Keshavjee; Gail Darling; Andre Pereira; Ashwini Kale; Hamid Bayanati; Igor Sitartchouk; Ming Tsao; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 9.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm; P E Bernatz; W S Payne; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; James R Jett; Ugo Pastorino; Melvyn S Tockman; Stephen J Swensen; Colin B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  CAXII Is a sero-diagnostic marker for lung cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Kobayashi; Toshihide Matsumoto; Shinichiro Ryuge; Kengo Yanagita; Ryo Nagashio; Yoshitaka Kawakami; Naoki Goshima; Shi-Xu Jiang; Makoto Saegusa; Akira Iyoda; Yukitoshi Satoh; Noriyuki Masuda; Yuichi Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Lung cancer screening with computer aided detection chest radiography: design and results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael Phillips; Barbara Risius; Bana Bazerbashi; Moulay Meziane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The assessment of the role of baseline low-dose CT scan in patients at high risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Anna Walecka; Tomasz Grodzki; Jacek Alchimowicz; Andrzej Smereczyński; Radosław Kiedrowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.